ONE-YEAR CLINICAL COMPARISON OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESINS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MALEKNEZHAD F.; GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH; GOUHARIAN R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Mashhad Dental School Year:2007 | Volume:31 | Issue:SPECIAL ISSUE Page(s): 39-43

Download Full-Text

View:

290

Download:

126

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ONE-YEAR CLINICAL COMPARISON OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESINS

Author(s)

MALEKNEZHAD F. | GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH | GOUHARIAN R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RESTORATION

POSTERIOR COMPOSITE

CLINICAL COMPARISON

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare a one-year clinical performance of two composites (Ariston PHC with Tetric) in class II cavity preparations.Materials & Methods: Ninety-six class I and II modified cavity preparations in identical patients were prepared. Metallic matrix was used for RESTORATION of class II preparations. Ariston PHC and Tetric were used for RESTORATIONs. The clinical criteria consisted of post-operative sensitivity, marginal discoloration, recurrent caries and marginal adaptation that were evaluated after one year.Results: The Fisher’s exact test, t-test and Chi-square Pearson were used for analysis of data (P£0.05). There was no significant difference between the two composites regarding post-operative sensitivity and marginal adaptation. Marginal discoloration by Ariston PHC was significantly less than Tetric. Most of this marginal discoloration was observed in proximal margins of class II RESTORATIONs. There were only two recurrent caries (5.1%) in cervical margins of Tetric RESTORATIONs. The maxilla and mandible did not have a significant effect on clinical criteria.Conclusion: There was no significant difference in post-operative sensitivity between the two composites. Marginal discoloration using Ariston PHC was significantly less than that of Tetric. No significant failure was observed when using any of the composites.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MALEKNEZHAD, F., GHAVAM NASIRI, MARJANEH, & GOUHARIAN, R.. (2007). ONE-YEAR CLINICAL COMPARISON OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESINS. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, 31(SPECIAL ISSUE), 39-43. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/553460/en

Vancouver: Copy

MALEKNEZHAD F., GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH, GOUHARIAN R.. ONE-YEAR CLINICAL COMPARISON OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESINS. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2007;31(SPECIAL ISSUE):39-43. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/553460/en

IEEE: Copy

F. MALEKNEZHAD, MARJANEH GHAVAM NASIRI, and R. GOUHARIAN, “ONE-YEAR CLINICAL COMPARISON OF TWO POSTERIOR COMPOSITE RESINS,” JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 31, no. SPECIAL ISSUE, pp. 39–43, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/553460/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops