مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,653
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

3

Information Journal Paper

Title

PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY AND TEACHING TECHNOLOGY

Pages

  75-98

Abstract

 Technology like other human or natural phenomena needs to be reflected upon Philosophically.Teaching technologyis dependent, among other things, on this kind of reflection. Different types of philosophy of technology should be criticized on the ground that some of them are popularized and shape our minds in practice. In this essay, two kinds of philosophy of technology are critecizedand a third kind is supported. Accordingto the first one, technology is considered as natural-neutral in terms of which technology is valutionally neutral and has one-sided effects on culture. According to the second one, technology is considered as cultural-cnivaluational in which the instrumental rationality is predominant. Finally, according to the third one, technology is regarded to be natural-cultural-multivaluational. In this view, other than the instrumental rationlity, moral and cosmological interests are also taken into account. Given the third version, its requirements in teaching technology is discussed. Accordingly, teaching technology should not be reduced to teaching. skills. Instead, il requires nOl only an access to the related sciences to technology, but also to provide social, moral, and cosomological interests in the puplis. In addition, an ahilily for evaluating the consequences of the usage ot technologYshould he provicde in them.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

BAGHERI, KH.. (2002). PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY AND TEACHING TECHNOLOGY. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 32(1), 75-98. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/55593/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAGHERI KH.. PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY AND TEACHING TECHNOLOGY. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION[Internet]. 2002;32(1):75-98. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/55593/en

IEEE: Copy

KH. BAGHERI, “PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY AND TEACHING TECHNOLOGY,” JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 75–98, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/55593/en

Related Journal Papers

Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top