A CRITICAL REVIEW OF IMPLICIT METAPHOR IN RHETORICAL WORKS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

REZAEI JAMKARANI AHMAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,003

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A CRITICAL REVIEW OF IMPLICIT METAPHOR IN RHETORICAL WORKS

Author(s)

REZAEI JAMKARANI AHMAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CRITICISMQ2

IMPLICIT METAPHORQ2

PERSIAN RHETORICQ2

ARABIC RHETORICQ2

Abstract

One of the controversial issues related to metaphor is IMPLICIT METAPHOR. There is no evidence of this metaphor in the first rhetorical works. Later, Jurjani discussed this type of metaphor but didn’t give a name to it. Since this term was coined, there were argues whether it is right or not. Some did not accept it as a metaphor; some recognized it as a kind of implicit simile, and some just repeated other’s views. Some researchers tried to solve the issue by considering it a kind of personification. However, they have finally admitted that the IMPLICIT METAPHOR is broader and more inclusive than personification. In addition to studying and reviewing this term chronologically in rhetorical works, in this paper, it is shown that rhetoricians were more interested in lexical aspects of this term rather than the definition of metaphor and focus on the IMPLICIT METAPHOR from a terminological aspect. While based on the definition of Sakkaki and some other rhetoricians, this structure is considered "metaphor", terms such as being “imaginative” can not be accepted. Personification, submerged metaphor, and animism must be recognized as branches of the IMPLICIT METAPHOR, not as alternatives for it.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

REZAEI JAMKARANI, AHMAD. (2017). A CRITICAL REVIEW OF IMPLICIT METAPHOR IN RHETORICAL WORKS. PIZHUHISH-I ZABAN VA ADABIYYAT-I FARSI, -(45 ), 1-20. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/56274/en

Vancouver: Copy

REZAEI JAMKARANI AHMAD. A CRITICAL REVIEW OF IMPLICIT METAPHOR IN RHETORICAL WORKS. PIZHUHISH-I ZABAN VA ADABIYYAT-I FARSI[Internet]. 2017;-(45 ):1-20. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/56274/en

IEEE: Copy

AHMAD REZAEI JAMKARANI, “A CRITICAL REVIEW OF IMPLICIT METAPHOR IN RHETORICAL WORKS,” PIZHUHISH-I ZABAN VA ADABIYYAT-I FARSI, vol. -, no. 45 , pp. 1–20, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/56274/en

Related Journal Papers