SPINAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ATTARI MOHAMMAD ALI; MIRHOSSEINI SAYYED AHMAD; HONARMAND AZIM; SAFAVI MOHAMMAD REZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS) Year:2011 | Volume:16 | Issue:4 Page(s): 524-529

Download Full-Text

View:

466

Download:

218

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SPINAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Author(s)

ATTARI MOHAMMAD ALI | MIRHOSSEINI SAYYED AHMAD | HONARMAND AZIM | SAFAVI MOHAMMAD REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ANESTHESIA

GENERAL

SPINAL

LUMBAR SURGERY

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Either GENERAL or regional ANESTHESIA can be used for lumbar disk surgery. The common anesthetic technique is GENERAL ANESTHESIA (GA). The aim of this study was to compare the intra and postoperative outcomes of SPINAL ANESTHESIA (SA) with GA in these patients.METHODS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. They were randomized into two groups with 37 patients in GA Group and 35 ones in SA Group. The heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), blood loss, surgeons satisfaction with the operating conditions, the severity of postoperative pain based on visual analogue scale (VAS) and analgesic use were recorded.RESULTS: The mean blood loss was significantly less in the SA Group compared to GA Group (p<0.05). Intraoperative maximum blood pressure and heart rate changes were significantly less in SA Group (p<0.05). The surgeons satisfaction was significantly more in the SA Group (p<0.05). The number of patients who used postoperative analgesic as well as postoperative mean VAS was significantly less in SA Group in comparison with GA group (p<0.05 for both).CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that SA was superior to GA in providing postoperative analgesia and decreasing blood loss while maintained better perioperative hemodynamic stability without increasing adverse side effects.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ATTARI, MOHAMMAD ALI, MIRHOSSEINI, SAYYED AHMAD, HONARMAND, AZIM, & SAFAVI, MOHAMMAD REZA. (2011). SPINAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), 16(4), 524-529. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/575909/en

Vancouver: Copy

ATTARI MOHAMMAD ALI, MIRHOSSEINI SAYYED AHMAD, HONARMAND AZIM, SAFAVI MOHAMMAD REZA. SPINAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS)[Internet]. 2011;16(4):524-529. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/575909/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMAD ALI ATTARI, SAYYED AHMAD MIRHOSSEINI, AZIM HONARMAND, and MOHAMMAD REZA SAFAVI, “SPINAL ANESTHESIA VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA FOR ELECTIVE LUMBAR SPINE SURGERY: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 524–529, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/575909/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops