COMPARING THE SIDE EFFECTS OF GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MASOUDIFAR MEHRDAD; YAZDAN PANAH MARAL; SAFAEI ALI; JABALAMELI MITRA; TAVAKOLIFARD NEGAH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Isfahan Medical School Year:2016 | Volume:34 | Issue:403 Page(s): 1231-1236

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

960

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING THE SIDE EFFECTS OF GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY

Author(s)

Keywords

SPINAL ANESTHESIAQ3

GENERAL ANESTHESIAQ2

TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSYQ1

Abstract

Background: Urinary tract stone is a common disease in urogenital system. The usual method for treatment of ureteral stones is TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY (TUL). The aim of this study was to compare the side effects of spinal versus GENERAL ANESTHESIA in TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY.Methods: This was a randomized clinical trial study on 90 patients undergoing TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY in Alzahra Hospital in Isfahan, Iran, during 2015-2016. Patients were divided in two groups of general and SPINAL ANESTHESIA. Two groups were compared about operation and recovery time, surgeon and patient satisfaction, vital signs and complications of anesthesia type. Statistical analysis was performed using independent t, Mann-Whitney, chi-square and Fisher's exact tests via SPSS software. P-value<0.05 considered significant.Findings: Recovery time was shorter in group receiving GENERAL ANESTHESIA (104.2±25.2 vs.80.0±24.4, P<0.001), while the number of people in need of pethidine (42.0 vs.21.0, P<0.001) and also the dose of pethidine was higher in this group (5.3±0.4 vs.2.2±0.4, P<0.001). GENERAL ANESTHESIA group reported higher rates of side effects as well (P=0.010).Conclusion: The findings of this study imply fewer side effects in the use of SPINAL ANESTHESIA for TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

MASOUDIFAR, MEHRDAD, YAZDAN PANAH, MARAL, SAFAEI, ALI, JABALAMELI, MITRA, & TAVAKOLIFARD, NEGAH. (2016). COMPARING THE SIDE EFFECTS OF GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 34(403), 1231-1236. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/50077/en

Vancouver: Copy

MASOUDIFAR MEHRDAD, YAZDAN PANAH MARAL, SAFAEI ALI, JABALAMELI MITRA, TAVAKOLIFARD NEGAH. COMPARING THE SIDE EFFECTS OF GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2016;34(403):1231-1236. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/50077/en

IEEE: Copy

MEHRDAD MASOUDIFAR, MARAL YAZDAN PANAH, ALI SAFAEI, MITRA JABALAMELI, and NEGAH TAVAKOLIFARD, “COMPARING THE SIDE EFFECTS OF GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN TRANSURETHRAL LITHOTRIPSY,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 34, no. 403, pp. 1231–1236, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/50077/en

Related Journal Papers