WHITEHEAD ON SUBSTANCE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SHAHMOHAMMEDI ROSTAM

Educational Videos and Scientific Workshops

Scientific Information Database

ISSN: 2588-4824

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY Year:2012 | Volume:2 | Issue:4 (8) Page(s): 7-26

Download Full-Text

View:

242

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

WHITEHEAD ON SUBSTANCE

Author(s)

SHAHMOHAMMEDI ROSTAM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SUBSTANCE

ACTUAL BEING

METAPHYSICS PROCESS

COSMOLOGY

LANGUAGE

Abstract

This paper intends to provide an analysis of Whitehead's view of SUBSTANCE in its traditional or Aristotelian sense based on his process cosmological principles. According to this analysis, he sees the roots of modern scientific materialism in Aristotelian SUBSTANCE and, following this, replaces the concept of SUBSTANCE with the concept of ACTUAL BEING within the framework of his own philosophy. The important point is that this does not mean his total rejection of SUBSTANCE. In fact, we can say that, on the one hand, Whitehead has a negative view of SUBSTANCE in the sense that he sees it inconsistent with his own cosmological principles from an ontological point of view and rejects it. On the other hand, he has a positive view of SUBSTANCE and considers it useful for common purposes of life in linguistic and practical respects. Therefore, it is concluded that, although Whitehead has seriously criticized Aristotelian SUBSTANCE and even substituted it with another concept, he has not totally rejected it.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SHAHMOHAMMEDI, ROSTAM. (2012). WHITEHEAD ON SUBSTANCE. HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, 2(4 (8)), 7-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/583328/en

Vancouver: Copy

SHAHMOHAMMEDI ROSTAM. WHITEHEAD ON SUBSTANCE. HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY[Internet]. 2012;2(4 (8)):7-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/583328/en

IEEE: Copy

ROSTAM SHAHMOHAMMEDI, “WHITEHEAD ON SUBSTANCE,” HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, vol. 2, no. 4 (8), pp. 7–26, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/583328/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops

File Not Exists.

Move to top

وبگردی