COBLATION VERSUS TRADITIONAL TONSILLECTOMY: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

OMRANI MOHAMMADREZA; BARATI BEHROUZ; OMIDIFAR NAVID; OKHOVVAT AHMAD REZA; GHAZIZADEH HASHEMI SEYED AMIRHOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS) Year:2011 | Volume:17 | Issue:1 Page(s): 45-50

Download Full-Text

View:

264

Download:

230

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COBLATION VERSUS TRADITIONAL TONSILLECTOMY: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL

Author(s)

Keywords

COBLATION

TONSILLECTOMY

COMPLICATIONS

Abstract

BACKGROUND: COBLATION TONSILLECTOMY is a new surgical technique and demands further research to be proven as a suitable and standard method of TONSILLECTOMY. This study compares COBLATION and traditional TONSILLECTOMY techniques in view of their advantages and COMPLICATIONS.METHODS: In a prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial information on operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, time needed to regain the normal diet and activity and post-operative hemorrhage were gathered and compared between two groups containing 47 patients in each group.RESULTS: We found statistically significant differences in operation time (p<0.05), intraoperative blood loss (p<0.05), postoperative pain (p<0.001), time needed to find back the normal diet (p<0.001) and normal activity (p<0.001). However, post operation hemorrhage (p>0.5) was not significantly different between two groups.CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a significantly less intraoperative or postoperative COMPLICATIONS and morbidity in COBLATION TONSILLECTOMY in comparison with traditional method. COBLATION was associated with less pain and quick return to normal diet and daily activity. These findings addressed COBLATION TONSILLECTOMY as an advanced method.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

OMRANI, MOHAMMADREZA, BARATI, BEHROUZ, OMIDIFAR, NAVID, OKHOVVAT, AHMAD REZA, & GHAZIZADEH HASHEMI, SEYED AMIRHOSSEIN. (2011). COBLATION VERSUS TRADITIONAL TONSILLECTOMY: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), 17(1), 45-50. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/592123/en

Vancouver: Copy

OMRANI MOHAMMADREZA, BARATI BEHROUZ, OMIDIFAR NAVID, OKHOVVAT AHMAD REZA, GHAZIZADEH HASHEMI SEYED AMIRHOSSEIN. COBLATION VERSUS TRADITIONAL TONSILLECTOMY: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS)[Internet]. 2011;17(1):45-50. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/592123/en

IEEE: Copy

MOHAMMADREZA OMRANI, BEHROUZ BARATI, NAVID OMIDIFAR, AHMAD REZA OKHOVVAT, and SEYED AMIRHOSSEIN GHAZIZADEH HASHEMI, “COBLATION VERSUS TRADITIONAL TONSILLECTOMY: A DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 45–50, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/592123/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops