مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,369
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF AZELAIC ACID 20% CREAM VERSUS CLINDAMYCIN 1% GEL IN TREATMENT OF ACNE

Pages

  137-142

Abstract

 Background & Objectives: Resistance Strains of propionibacterium ACNEs is one of the most growing problems in ACNE treatment. AZELAIC ACID, due to the lack of bacterial resistance, could be a useful alternative in topical treatment of ACNE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects and side effects of AZELAIC ACID and its comparison with TOPICAL CLINDAMYCIN in the treatment of ACNE.Methods: This randomized clinical trial study was performed on 100 patients with mild ACNE.The patients were divided in to two groups. One group was treated with AZELAIC ACID 20% cream and the other one was treated with Dalacin 1% gel twice daily for 4 weeks.Results: Both drugs Produced significant reduction in inflammatory Lesions (for azelaiCacid p=0.000 and for clindamycin p=0.000) and noninflammatory lesions (for AZELAIC ACID P=0.001 for clindamycin p=0.033). Comparing the mean of decrease in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesions, there was not a significant difference between two groups (of Papule and Pustule P=0.864 of comedons P=0.239). So the efficacy of these two drugs was same. In comparing the sideffects, erythem was more common in AZELAIC ACID users significantly (p=0.031) and skin dryness was more Common in clindamycin users significantly (p=0.000).Conclusion: AZELAIC ACID 20% cream as effective as clindamycin gel 1% in the treatment of mild ACNE.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    DELGOSHAEI, F., MAALEKI, F., RAMEZANI, MOHAMMAD, & YOUSEFI, J.. (2007). A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF AZELAIC ACID 20% CREAM VERSUS CLINDAMYCIN 1% GEL IN TREATMENT OF ACNE. JOURNAL OF ARDABIL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JAUMS), 7(2 (24)), 137-142. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/60004/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    DELGOSHAEI F., MAALEKI F., RAMEZANI MOHAMMAD, YOUSEFI J.. A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF AZELAIC ACID 20% CREAM VERSUS CLINDAMYCIN 1% GEL IN TREATMENT OF ACNE. JOURNAL OF ARDABIL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JAUMS)[Internet]. 2007;7(2 (24)):137-142. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/60004/en

    IEEE: Copy

    F. DELGOSHAEI, F. MAALEKI, MOHAMMAD RAMEZANI, and J. YOUSEFI, “A COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY OF AZELAIC ACID 20% CREAM VERSUS CLINDAMYCIN 1% GEL IN TREATMENT OF ACNE,” JOURNAL OF ARDABIL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JAUMS), vol. 7, no. 2 (24), pp. 137–142, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/60004/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button