COMPARISON OF DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK IN OUTPATIENT SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZAND F.; SADEGHI SEYED EBRAHIM; AMINI AFSHIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE Year:2007 | Volume:28 | Issue:56 Page(s): 40-46

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

888

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK IN OUTPATIENT SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA

Author(s)

ZAND F. | SADEGHI SEYED EBRAHIM | AMINI AFSHIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EQUIPMENTQ3

LARYNGEAL TUBEQ3

AIRWAYQ3

Abstract

Background: The reusable LARYNGEAL TUBE "LT-RD and disposable LARYNGEAL TUBE "LT-D" are two relatively new devices introduced for maintaining the AIRWAY during controlled ventilation under general ansthesia. Materials and Methods: The present investigation compared the performance of the LT-R and LT-D randomized controlled study 100 ASA I, II, III patients, aged 15-65 years undergoing elective minor surgery received either a LT-R (n=50) or LT-D (n=50) for AIRWAY management. After induction of general anesthesia, devices were inserted, correct placement was verified, and AIRWAY leak pressure was measured. Time of insertion, quality of AIRWAY seal, fiberoptic view and post-operative pharyngeal morbidity was examined. Results: First time and second time success rates were comparable for both groups (90 vs 96% and 96 vs 98% in LT-D and LT-R groups, respectively). The AIRWAY of two patients in first group could not be maintained with LT-D. Time until delivery of first tidal volume for LT-D and LTR was 28.48±2.1 sec and 23±2.1, fixation and manipulation time was 50±2.2 and 47±2.5 respectively.Conclusion: Patients were questioned for a variety of post-operative pharyngeal morbidities. Significant differences were seen between these groups in the morbidities. Both devices seem to provide a secure AIRWAY, work similar in clinical utility, and are easy to insert.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ZAND, F., SADEGHI, SEYED EBRAHIM, & AMINI, AFSHIN. (2007). COMPARISON OF DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK IN OUTPATIENT SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, 28(56), 40-46. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/63171/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZAND F., SADEGHI SEYED EBRAHIM, AMINI AFSHIN. COMPARISON OF DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK IN OUTPATIENT SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE[Internet]. 2007;28(56):40-46. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/63171/en

IEEE: Copy

F. ZAND, SEYED EBRAHIM SADEGHI, and AFSHIN AMINI, “COMPARISON OF DISPOSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK AND REUSABLE LARYNGEAL MASK IN OUTPATIENT SURGERY UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA,” JOURNAL OF IRANIAN SOCIETY ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND INTENSIVE CARE, vol. 28, no. 56, pp. 40–46, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/63171/en

Related Journal Papers