مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

85
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

50
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of the Positive Rate and Diagnostic Value of Capsule Endoscopy and Double-Balloon Enteroscopy in Small Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Pages

  218-223

Abstract

 Background: Capsule endoscopy (CE) and Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) have provided great help in the Diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases (SBD). The aim of this study was to explore the Positive rate and diagnostic value of CE and DBE for patients who were suspected of having SBD, and to make a comparison between the two methods. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to analyze the cases at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University. We divided the patients into CE and DBE group, and recorded the basic characteristics of the patients, checking the results of CE and DBE, Positive rate, sensitivity and specificity for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 244 patients were included in our research, including 122 in the CE group and 122 in the DBE group. The Positive rate of CE for Intestinal diseases was 84. 4%, higher than that of DBE (78. 7%), but DBE (75. 2% and 92. 3%) had higher sensitivity and specificity than CE (70. 5% and 88. 2%), though the differences were not statistically significant. The three most common positive findings in patients were inflammation, erosion, or ulcers (28. 7%), vascular malformations (14. 3%), and eminence lesions (9. 0%). CE had a higher rate detection of inflammation, erosion, or ulcers than DBE (36. 1% vs 21. 3%), but they both had high Positive rates for vascular malformations (13. 9% and 14. 8%). In addition, both methods had higher Positive rates in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding compared to other symptoms. Conclusion: CE and DBE are both important methods for intestinal examination. Patients can choose appropriate tests according to their condition.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Ye, Xiaoling, Liao, Yuting, & Deng, Tao. (2021). Comparison of the Positive Rate and Diagnostic Value of Capsule Endoscopy and Double-Balloon Enteroscopy in Small Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 24(3), 218-223. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/669928/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Ye Xiaoling, Liao Yuting, Deng Tao. Comparison of the Positive Rate and Diagnostic Value of Capsule Endoscopy and Double-Balloon Enteroscopy in Small Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE[Internet]. 2021;24(3):218-223. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/669928/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Xiaoling Ye, Yuting Liao, and Tao Deng, “Comparison of the Positive Rate and Diagnostic Value of Capsule Endoscopy and Double-Balloon Enteroscopy in Small Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis,” ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 218–223, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/669928/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button