THE COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS BY CATREL- DOBUSETT AND HARINGTON DISTRACTION + SUBLAMINAR WIRING SYSTEMS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHAYEM HASANKHANI E.; PEYVANDI M.T.; REZVANI H.; SASANNEZHAD P.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Internal Medicine Today Year:2005 | Volume:10 | Issue:4 Page(s): 43-47

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

862

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS BY CATREL- DOBUSETT AND HARINGTON DISTRACTION + SUBLAMINAR WIRING SYSTEMS

Author(s)

GHAYEM HASANKHANI E. | PEYVANDI M.T. | REZVANI H. | SASANNEZHAD P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IDIOPATHICQ3

SCOLIOSISQ3

CD SYSTEMQ4

HD + SLW SYSTEMQ4

INSTRUMENTATIONQ4

Abstract

Background and Aim: IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS is one of the most common orthopaedic disorders that may progress to a severe musculo skeletal problem if is not treated. Discussion about the treatment of IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS has been in the history of orthopaedia since a long time ago. The purpose of this study is finding of an appropriate device for spine INSTRUMENTATION.Materials and Methods: In this study, 28 patients, 8 male (28.5%) and 20 female (71.5%) with IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS were studied between 1999 and 2002 in Shahid Kamiab hospital of Mashhad. The mean age was 16.95 years (from 12-33 years). Follow up time was 1.5- 4 year. Nine patients (32.1%) had posterior spinal fusion (PSF) and 19 patients (67.2%) had anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and PSF. In 14 (50%) patients Cotrel- Dubousset (CD) system and in 14 (50%) patients Harrington distraction+ sub laminar wiring system (HD+SLW) were used for INSTRUMENTATION.Results: Bleeding during operation was 455.5±84.5 cc in CD SYSTEM and 438.5±61.75 cc in HD+SL W system duration of operation was 4.26±0.56 hours in CD SYSTEM and 4.22±0.33 hours in HD+SL W system.Curve correction was 63.3% in CD SYSTEM and 64.15% in HD+SL W system. There was not a significant difference between tow systems (X2=95%). Loss of correction was 10% in tow systems.Conclusion: The results in tow systems are the same with no significant difference, but the HD+SLW system is ideal because of lower price and simple application.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHAYEM HASANKHANI, E., PEYVANDI, M.T., REZVANI, H., & SASANNEZHAD, P.. (2005). THE COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS BY CATREL- DOBUSETT AND HARINGTON DISTRACTION + SUBLAMINAR WIRING SYSTEMS. OFOGH-E-DANESH, 10(4), 43-47. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/68281/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHAYEM HASANKHANI E., PEYVANDI M.T., REZVANI H., SASANNEZHAD P.. THE COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS BY CATREL- DOBUSETT AND HARINGTON DISTRACTION + SUBLAMINAR WIRING SYSTEMS. OFOGH-E-DANESH[Internet]. 2005;10(4):43-47. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/68281/en

IEEE: Copy

E. GHAYEM HASANKHANI, M.T. PEYVANDI, H. REZVANI, and P. SASANNEZHAD, “THE COMPARISON OF SURGICAL TREATMENT OF IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS BY CATREL- DOBUSETT AND HARINGTON DISTRACTION + SUBLAMINAR WIRING SYSTEMS,” OFOGH-E-DANESH, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 43–47, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/68281/en

Related Journal Papers