مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

318
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

240
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE ANKLE‑BRACHIAL INDEX BY OSCILLOMETRIC BLOOD PRESSURE AND AUTOMATED ANKLE‑BRACHIAL INDEX

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Background: This study was conducted to assess the VALIDITY and RELIABILITY of ankle‑brachial index (ABI) by oscillometric bloodpressure (BP) measurement as compared with an automated ABI as a gold standard. Materials and Methods: This study was conductedat Golden Jubilee Medical Center, Thailand. All the data were collected from 303 patients at risk of PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE (PAD)who were 45 years of age or above and who underwent treatment at the outpatient medical clinic between June and December 2015.Patients who were followed up at the medical clinic had both oscillometric BP measurement (Terumo, ES‑P600) and an automatedABI (oscillometric method) at the same time. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of theoscillometric BP measurements to predict an abnormal ABI (<0.90) were determined using the automated ABI as the gold standard.Results: ABI values were similar between the two methods. The oscillometric BP method for determining an ABI (cutoff point<0.90)on the right side had a sensitivity of 88.89%, specificity of 99.32%, an accuracy of 99.01%, a positive predictive value of 80%, and anegative predictive value of 99.32% whereas ABI on the left side had a sensitivity of 69.23%, a specificity of 99.66%, an accuracy of98.35%, a positive predictive value of 90%, and a negative predictive value of 98.63%. RELIABILITY of the oscillometric BP method byKappa statistics was 0.84 on the right side and 0.77 on the left side (P=0.000).Conclusion: The oscillometric BP method is a reliableand useful alternative to conventional automated ABI determination in patients with no severe arterial occlusion for estimation ofthe prevalence and screening of PAD in primary health‑care settings.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    CHONGTHAWONSATID, SUKANYA, & DUTSADEEVETTAKUL, SOMCHAI. (2017). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE ANKLE?BRACHIAL INDEX BY OSCILLOMETRIC BLOOD PRESSURE AND AUTOMATED ANKLE?BRACHIAL INDEX. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), 22(1), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/692435/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    CHONGTHAWONSATID SUKANYA, DUTSADEEVETTAKUL SOMCHAI. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE ANKLE?BRACHIAL INDEX BY OSCILLOMETRIC BLOOD PRESSURE AND AUTOMATED ANKLE?BRACHIAL INDEX. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS)[Internet]. 2017;22(1):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/692435/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SUKANYA CHONGTHAWONSATID, and SOMCHAI DUTSADEEVETTAKUL, “VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE ANKLE?BRACHIAL INDEX BY OSCILLOMETRIC BLOOD PRESSURE AND AUTOMATED ANKLE?BRACHIAL INDEX,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES (JRMS), vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 0–0, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/692435/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button