مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

78
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

44
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

On Motahhari's Theodicy of Hell

Pages

  127-139

Abstract

 One of the main problems for the doctrine of the traditional view of hell is Proportionality objection. It claims that eternal punishments for finite crimes of human beings cause undue harm and therefore are incompatible with divine justice. The proportionality principle states that the degree of punishment that a person justly merits must be proportionate to the level of his wrongdoing. One of the common ways to respond to this objection is rejecting the retributive nature of hell. Morteza Motahhari denied retributivism by distinguishing between the criminal system of the world and hereafter. He believed punishments in hell are identical to human deeds and they are nothing more than spiritual aspect of them. Regarding this view which is called ’ Self-imposed punishments’ , God is not the punisher of the sinners, and the residents of hell suffer from their sinful actions. This paper begins with examining Motahhari’ s metaphysical theory of punishment as a theodicy of hell. Then I will discuss a modal argument against his theory. I shall argue there is not a necessary correlation between crimes and punishments. My conclusion is that Motahhari’ s theodicy would be undermined God’ s moral perfection either therefore it does not get God off the moral hook.

Multimedia

  • No record.

    • Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHARIFZADEH, FARZAD. (2021). On Motahhari's Theodicy of Hell. THEOSOPHIA ISLAMICA, 1(1), 127-139. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/699448/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHARIFZADEH FARZAD. On Motahhari's Theodicy of Hell. THEOSOPHIA ISLAMICA[Internet]. 2021;1(1):127-139. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/699448/en

    IEEE: Copy

    FARZAD SHARIFZADEH, “On Motahhari's Theodicy of Hell,” THEOSOPHIA ISLAMICA, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 127–139, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/699448/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button