Prestige and Dominance as Differential Correlates of Moral Foundations and Its Clinical Implications

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHANIPOUR HAMID; pourali Mahsan; Atar Mojgan

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Practice in Clinical Psychology Year:2021 | Volume:9 | Issue:1 Page(s): 1-8

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

125

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Prestige and Dominance as Differential Correlates of Moral Foundations and Its Clinical Implications

Author(s)

KHANIPOUR HAMID | pourali Mahsan | Atar Mojgan | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Social status

Morality

Social acceptance

Morals

Mental disorders

Abstract

Objective: How people use social rank (dominance vs prestige) could explain different attitudes toward five moral foundations. This study aimed to investigate the differential relationships between prestige, dominance, and moral foundations. Methods: This study was conducted on 150 participants who responded to the moral foundation questionnaire and dominance-prestige scale. Results: Multiple regression analysis revealed that prestige was positively associated with four kinds of moral foundations (harm/care, reciprocity/fairness, loyalty/subversion, and purity/ sanctity), whereas dominance was negatively associated with harm/care, reciprocity/fairness, and progressivism. Prestige had a stronger association with moral foundations than dominance. Conclusion: It seems that dominance as a Social status seeking-strategy is against any moral foundation, but prestige could increase attention to moral foundations in decision making toward every life issue.

Cites

No record.

References