مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

9,379
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF ORAL AND SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL IN INDUCTION OF DELIVERY

Pages

  20-25

Abstract

 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Delivery is believed to be physiologic process that the majority of pregnant women experience it successfully; however its probable complications may occur suddenly. Early admission in delivery unit is important especially in the cases with known fetal or maternal risk factors. The aim of this study was to compare oral and sublingual (50µg) misoprostol in induction of TERM DELIVERY.METHODS: This clinical trial study was performed on 150 pregnant women with gestational age ≥37 weeks that admitted for INDUCTION OF LABOR. Having inclusion criteria, patients included in this study obtained NST (Non Stress Test) and received 50 microgram oral or sublingual randomly. Then two methods were compared with regard to maternal and fetal complication, induction to delivery interval, drug dose and the rate of cesarean delivery, Proportions were compared by t- test and fisher's exact tests. FINDINGS: From 150 cases, 75 patients were assigned to oral misoprostol and 75 patients were assigned to sublingual misoprostol group. Mean of time from induction to delivery in oral group was 8.53±3.55 hours and in sublingual group was 7.05±3.16 hours (p=0.008). Maternal and fetal outcome in each group showed significant difference but labor complication, drug dose, the rate of cesarean delivery and women who needed to oxytoxin did not show significant difference.CONCLUSION: The results showed that sublingual route of misoprostol administration has greater efficacy in labor induction and additionally was better tolerated by pregnant women.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NIROUMANESH, SHIRIN, TALEBZADEH NOORI, Z., & HOSSEINPOUR, M.. (2006). COMPARISON OF ORAL AND SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL IN INDUCTION OF DELIVERY. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), 8(5 (33)), 20-25. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/73104/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NIROUMANESH SHIRIN, TALEBZADEH NOORI Z., HOSSEINPOUR M.. COMPARISON OF ORAL AND SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL IN INDUCTION OF DELIVERY. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS)[Internet]. 2006;8(5 (33)):20-25. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/73104/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SHIRIN NIROUMANESH, Z. TALEBZADEH NOORI, and M. HOSSEINPOUR, “COMPARISON OF ORAL AND SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL IN INDUCTION OF DELIVERY,” JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), vol. 8, no. 5 (33), pp. 20–25, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/73104/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button