مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

896
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN SEROLOGY (ELISA) AND ENDOSCOPY AND BIOPSY IN THE FOLLOW UP OF PATIENTS AFTER TREATMENT OF H.PYLORI INFECTION

Pages

  15-18

Keywords

Abstract

 OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori eradication is recommended in gastric and duodental ulcer and MALT lymphoma management. For following up of patients after treatment of H.PYLORI infection, invasive and non-invasive procedures can be performed. The objective of this study was to compare invasive and non-invasive procedures. METHODS: 150 patients with H.PYLORI positive were selected for our study and divided into three groups. In all groups quadriple therapy (omeprazole, bismuth, metronidazole and amoxicillin) was done. One month later ENDOSCOPY and biopsy, SEROLOGY (H.pylori ELISA IgA) and SEROLOGY (H.pylori ELISA IgG) were done in first, second and third group respectively and compared for H.PYLORI eradication. FINDINGS: 127 patients remained as subjects in our study. In first group, ENDOSCOPY and biopsy was done again and we found no H.PYLORI in 70.7% of the cases of the first group, 35.7% and 20.5% of the cases of the second and third group respectively and this difference was statistically meaningful (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In spite of the fact that ENDOSCOPY and biopsy in comparison to SEROLOGY is an invasive procedure, it is recommended for short term follow up of patients (one month).

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SAVADKOOHI, SH., HEYDARI-, B., & RAHMANI FIROUZJAEI, A.. (2001). A COMPARISON BETWEEN SEROLOGY (ELISA) AND ENDOSCOPY AND BIOPSY IN THE FOLLOW UP OF PATIENTS AFTER TREATMENT OF H.PYLORI INFECTION. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), 3(4 (12)), 15-18. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/73735/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SAVADKOOHI SH., HEYDARI- B., RAHMANI FIROUZJAEI A.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN SEROLOGY (ELISA) AND ENDOSCOPY AND BIOPSY IN THE FOLLOW UP OF PATIENTS AFTER TREATMENT OF H.PYLORI INFECTION. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS)[Internet]. 2001;3(4 (12)):15-18. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/73735/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SH. SAVADKOOHI, B. HEYDARI-, and A. RAHMANI FIROUZJAEI, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN SEROLOGY (ELISA) AND ENDOSCOPY AND BIOPSY IN THE FOLLOW UP OF PATIENTS AFTER TREATMENT OF H.PYLORI INFECTION,” JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), vol. 3, no. 4 (12), pp. 15–18, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/73735/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button