COMPARISON OF DIA WITH HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION (HI) AND ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY (EIA) IN DIAGNOSIS OF MEASLES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YAHYAPOUR Y.; MOKHTARI AZAD T.; MAHMOUDI M.; PEZESHKI M.; NATEGH R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS) Year:2001 | Volume:3 | Issue:2 (10) Page(s): 12-17

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

645

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DIA WITH HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION (HI) AND ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY (EIA) IN DIAGNOSIS OF MEASLES

Author(s)

Keywords

DOT - IMMUNOASSAYQ4

HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITIONQ4

ELISAQ2

MEASLESQ4

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: MEASLES is one of the acute and contagious diseases of human, and according to the estimation of the world health organization (WHO), it may be eradicated by the year 2010. Therefore, diagnosis of MEASLES is emphasized by using quick and sensitive methods for control and prevention of MEASLES. METHODS: Various methods are used to diagnose antibody against MEASLES virus, include HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION (HI), enzyme immunoassay (EIA), plaque reduction (PR) and neutralization test (NT). One of these methods is dot-immunoassay (DIA). In this method, nitrocellulose paper is used as solid phase instead of microplate. FINDINGS: In this study, DIA in comparison to HI had 98.8% sensitivity and 85% specificity, and in comparison to EIA had 96.5%, 90% sensitivity and specificity respectively. CONCLUSION: This technique has advantages such as sensitivity, high specificity, low cost and speed.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

YAHYAPOUR, Y., MOKHTARI AZAD, T., MAHMOUDI, M., PEZESHKI, M., & NATEGH, R.. (2001). COMPARISON OF DIA WITH HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION (HI) AND ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY (EIA) IN DIAGNOSIS OF MEASLES. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), 3(2 (10)), 12-17. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/73745/en

Vancouver: Copy

YAHYAPOUR Y., MOKHTARI AZAD T., MAHMOUDI M., PEZESHKI M., NATEGH R.. COMPARISON OF DIA WITH HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION (HI) AND ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY (EIA) IN DIAGNOSIS OF MEASLES. JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS)[Internet]. 2001;3(2 (10)):12-17. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/73745/en

IEEE: Copy

Y. YAHYAPOUR, T. MOKHTARI AZAD, M. MAHMOUDI, M. PEZESHKI, and R. NATEGH, “COMPARISON OF DIA WITH HEMAGGLUTINATION INHIBITION (HI) AND ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY (EIA) IN DIAGNOSIS OF MEASLES,” JOURNAL OF BABOL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JBUMS), vol. 3, no. 2 (10), pp. 12–17, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/73745/en

Related Journal Papers