COMPARISON OF RETENTIVE STRENGTH IN VARIABLE ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS IN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED OVERDENTURE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AHMADZADEH ASADOALLAH; FEREIDOONPOOR NAJMEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Mashhad Dental School Year:2013 | Volume:36 | Issue:4 (83) Page(s): 259-270

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,041

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF RETENTIVE STRENGTH IN VARIABLE ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS IN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED OVERDENTURE

Author(s)

AHMADZADEH ASADOALLAH | FEREIDOONPOOR NAJMEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ATTACHMENTQ2

RETENTIONQ2

OVERDENTUREQ2

IMPLANTQ2

Abstract

Introduction: Considering to patient’s complications with conventional denture in the lower arch, the requirement of a denture with more efficacy and cheaper than conventional ones, is definite. One of the most conventional ones is an OVERDENTURE with 2 IMPLANT. The purpose of this study was comparison of four types of different ATTACHMENT systems including two prefabricated and 2 castable ATTACHMENTs.Materials & Methods: Four groups with 6 numbers of ATTACHMENTs (Superflex ball, locator, castable Ball on bar, castable Bar) were selected. 2 castable groups were casted; these ATTACHMENTs were put on IMPLANT fixtures. Then a Cr-Co framework was made. It was put on cast and ATTACHMENTs and an acrylic base was made on this assembly. All the samples were put in universal testing machine and a tension force of 50 Newton was loaded to seprate framework from cast. The tension force was recorded. After data collection, the data were analyzed through SPSS version 16 by One-Way ANOVA and Teukey test.Results: Results showed that RETENTION force of castable ball on bar (35. 31N) was the greatest followed by ball (33.33N, P=0.007), Locator (20.90N) and castable bar (14.74N), respectively (P<0.001).Conclusion: Castable ball on bar was comparable to ball regarding the retentive force. Therefore this cheap ATTACHMENT could be used in patients instead of prefabricated one. These ATTACHMENTs have more RETENTION compared to locators which are expensive. When less RETENTION is needed, castable bar can be used, and when more RETENTION is needed, castable ball on bar is recommended.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AHMADZADEH, ASADOALLAH, & FEREIDOONPOOR, NAJMEH. (2013). COMPARISON OF RETENTIVE STRENGTH IN VARIABLE ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS IN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED OVERDENTURE. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, 36(4 (83)), 259-270. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/73972/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHMADZADEH ASADOALLAH, FEREIDOONPOOR NAJMEH. COMPARISON OF RETENTIVE STRENGTH IN VARIABLE ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS IN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED OVERDENTURE. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2013;36(4 (83)):259-270. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/73972/en

IEEE: Copy

ASADOALLAH AHMADZADEH, and NAJMEH FEREIDOONPOOR, “COMPARISON OF RETENTIVE STRENGTH IN VARIABLE ATTACHMENT SYSTEMS IN IMPLANT-SUPPORTED OVERDENTURE,” JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 36, no. 4 (83), pp. 259–270, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/73972/en

Related Journal Papers