مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,126
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF TWO TYPES OF TWO IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURE ATTACHMENTS ON THE STRESSES INTRODUCED TO THE MANDIBULAR POSTERIOR RESIDUAL RIDGE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

Pages

  18-26

Abstract

 Background and Aim: The biomechanics of IMPLANT-retained OVERDENTURE can lead to different resorption patterns in the posterior regions of each arch. Two of the most commonly used attachment systems for these type of prostheses are Bar/clip and Ball with different biomechanical properties. The aim of the present study was to compare two types of IMPLANT-retained OVERDENTURE attachments on the stresses introduced to the mandibular POSTERIOR RESIDUAL RIDGE by means of 3D Finite Element Method.Materials and Methods: This experimental study performed with Ansys software. The basic model was generated from data provided by a CT-scan of edentulous patient. Two root form IMPLANTs were placed in inter foramen region of the mandible. Models were used in order to simulate two situations: In group A, model represented an edentulous mandible supporting an over denture retained by two-splinted IMPLANTs connected with Bar/clip system while in group B, model simulated an edentulous mandible supporting an OVERDENTURE retained by two solitary IMPLANTs with Ball attachments. The occlusal load of maxillary complete denture was introduced in two directions for each group: vertical load as in centric occlusion, and oblique load as in working lateral excursion.Results: The amount of stress introduced by over denture using Bar attachment was higher in centric occlusion and working lateral excursion.Conclusion: If the only determining factor for choosing the attachment system was the amount of stress introduced to the mandibular posterior ridge, then the Ball system would be the attachment of choice.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    DASHTI, M., ATASHRAZM, P., IMANI, M.M., & MISHAEEL, S.. (2009). A COMPARISON OF TWO TYPES OF TWO IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURE ATTACHMENTS ON THE STRESSES INTRODUCED TO THE MANDIBULAR POSTERIOR RESIDUAL RIDGE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL SCIENCES, 6(3 (21)), 18-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/184778/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    DASHTI M., ATASHRAZM P., IMANI M.M., MISHAEEL S.. A COMPARISON OF TWO TYPES OF TWO IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURE ATTACHMENTS ON THE STRESSES INTRODUCED TO THE MANDIBULAR POSTERIOR RESIDUAL RIDGE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2009;6(3 (21)):18-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/184778/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M. DASHTI, P. ATASHRAZM, M.M. IMANI, and S. MISHAEEL, “A COMPARISON OF TWO TYPES OF TWO IMPLANT-RETAINED OVERDENTURE ATTACHMENTS ON THE STRESSES INTRODUCED TO THE MANDIBULAR POSTERIOR RESIDUAL RIDGE: 3D FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL SCIENCES, vol. 6, no. 3 (21), pp. 18–26, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/184778/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top