A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FRACTURE STRENGTH OF PULPOTOMIZED PRIMARY MOLARS AFTER RESTORATION WITH
COMPOMER AND COMPOSITE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AJAMI B.; GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH; SHAFIEE S.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Mashhad Dental School Year:2005 | Volume:28 | Issue:3-4 Page(s): 211-220

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

924

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FRACTURE STRENGTH OF PULPOTOMIZED PRIMARY MOLARS AFTER RESTORATION WITH COMPOMER AND COMPOSITE

Author(s)

AJAMI B. | GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH | SHAFIEE S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COMPOMERQ4

COMPOSITEQ4

FRACTURE STRENGTHQ3

PULPOTOMYQ3

PRIMARY MOLARQ4

Abstract

Introduction: Maintenance of primary teeth has a special importance for development of occlusion and arc stability. Primary teeth which have lost a lot of tooth structure are restored routinely with stainless steel crowns. Bonded restorations reinforce the remnant structure of tooth and increase the FRACTURE STRENGTH. The purpose of this study was to determine the FRACTURE STRENGTH of pulpotomized PRIMARY MOLARs after restoring with Coremax II and Compoglass.Materials & Methods: In this parallel in vitro interventional study, 60 extracted second PRIMARY MOLARs were selected. After the teeth were mounted in self-curing acrylic resin, the standard PULPOTOMY was performed. The teeth were divided into 3 groups of 20. Group A was restored with Coremax II, group B with Compoglass and group C (control) with amalgam. All groups were subdivided into 2 subgroups for load cycling Subgroups A1, B1 and C1 were regarded as baseline without load cycling. Subgroups A2, B2 and C2 were loaded for a period of 5 days load cycling. After that, the specimens were placed in Incubator for 24 hours. Finally all groups were fractured in the Instron Machine. Compressive test was performed with the round Cross head speed of 5-mm/min. All specimens were examined for type of fracture (adhesive, cohesive) with use of a steriomicroscope (x16). Quantitative data analysis was done using ANOVA and Duncan's test with a 95% significance level. Chi-square test was performed for evaluation of kind of fracture.Results: There was an interaction between two factors of time and material (P<0.05). The time interval had a significant effect on mean FRACTURE STRENGTHs of Coremax II and amalgam (P<0.05). The most FRACTURE STRENGTH was observed at base line. Kind of material had a significant effect on FRACTURE STRENGTH. At baseline, Compoglass had the least mean FRACTURE STRENGTH (97.19 kg) and Coremax II had the greatest one (131.39). After 5 years there was no significant difference in FRACTURE STRENGTH between amalgam and Compoglass, but the FRACTURE STRENGTH of Coremax was significantly higher than the others (P<0.05).There was a correlation between kind of fracture and material. In amalgam, 100% of fracture was of adhesive and in Compoglass, 60% of cohesive type while in Coremax II, 85% of the fracture was of adhesive type.Conclusion: According to this study and because of high FRACTURE STRENGTH of teeth restored with Core max II, this material is an acceptable restoration material just for restoration of pulpotomized PRIMARY MOLARs.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AJAMI, B., GHAVAM NASIRI, MARJANEH, & SHAFIEE, S.. (2005). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FRACTURE STRENGTH OF PULPOTOMIZED PRIMARY MOLARS AFTER RESTORATION WITH COMPOMER AND COMPOSITE. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, 28(3-4), 211-220. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/74385/en

Vancouver: Copy

AJAMI B., GHAVAM NASIRI MARJANEH, SHAFIEE S.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FRACTURE STRENGTH OF PULPOTOMIZED PRIMARY MOLARS AFTER RESTORATION WITH COMPOMER AND COMPOSITE. JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL[Internet]. 2005;28(3-4):211-220. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/74385/en

IEEE: Copy

B. AJAMI, MARJANEH GHAVAM NASIRI, and S. SHAFIEE, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FRACTURE STRENGTH OF PULPOTOMIZED PRIMARY MOLARS AFTER RESTORATION WITH COMPOMER AND COMPOSITE,” JOURNAL OF MASHHAD DENTAL SCHOOL, vol. 28, no. 3-4, pp. 211–220, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/74385/en

Related Journal Papers