Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Rattanavipapong Waranya; Kapoor Ritika; TEERAWATTANANON YOT; Luttjeboer Jos; Botwright Siobhan; Archer Rachel A.; Giersing Birgitte; Hutubessy Raymond C.W.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Year:2020 | Volume:9 | Issue:10 Page(s): 439-447

Download Full-Text

View:

136

Download:

141

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand

Author(s)

Keywords

Vaccine

Universal Health Coverage

Health Technology Assessment

Priority Setting

Thailand

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed the Total System Effectiveness (TSE) framework to assist national policy-makers in prioritizing Vaccines. The pilot was launched in Thailand to explore the potential use of TSE in a country with established governance structures and accountable decision-making processes for immunization policy. While the existing literature informs Vaccine adoption decisions in GAVI-eligible countries, this study attempts to address a gap in the literature by examining the policy process of a non-GAVI eligible country. Methods: A rotavirus Vaccine (RVV) test case was used to compare the decision criteria made by the existing processes (Expanded Program on Immunization [EPI], and National List of Essential Medicines [NLEM]) for Vaccine prioritization and the TSE-pilot model, using Thailand specific data. Results: The existing decision-making processes in Thailand and TSE were found to offer similar recommendations on the selection of a RVV product. Conclusion: The authors believe that TSE can provide a well-reasoned and step by step approach for countries, especially low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), to develop a systematic and transparent decision-making process for immunization policy.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Rattanavipapong, Waranya, Kapoor, Ritika, TEERAWATTANANON, YOT, Luttjeboer, Jos, Botwright, Siobhan, Archer, Rachel A., Giersing, Birgitte, & Hutubessy, Raymond C.W.. (2020). Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 9(10), 439-447. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/746669/en

Vancouver: Copy

Rattanavipapong Waranya, Kapoor Ritika, TEERAWATTANANON YOT, Luttjeboer Jos, Botwright Siobhan, Archer Rachel A., Giersing Birgitte, Hutubessy Raymond C.W.. Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2020;9(10):439-447. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/746669/en

IEEE: Copy

Waranya Rattanavipapong, Ritika Kapoor, YOT TEERAWATTANANON, Jos Luttjeboer, Siobhan Botwright, Rachel A. Archer, Birgitte Giersing, and Raymond C.W. Hutubessy, “Comparing 3 Approaches for Making Vaccine Adoption Decisions in Thailand,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 439–447, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/746669/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops