مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,395
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE RAAT AND RAST ANAEROBIC TEST IN ESTIMATING OF ANAEROBIC POWER

Pages

  51-59

Abstract

 The purpose of this study was to determine validity and reliability of the Repeated Agility-based anaerobic TEST (RAAT) and Running- based Anaerobic Sprint TEST (RAST). The subjects were selected randomly (n=36) among male P.E students. They performed the RAAT and RAST TEST. The WINGATE anaerobic TEST also used as criteria TEST. The data was analyzed by regression pattern (p<0.05). The result showed that the correlation of RAAT and WINGATE TEST wasn’t significant only in absolute and relative minimum power (absolute minimum power p=0.08 r=0.29, relative minimum power p=0.5 r=0.12) but was significant in other variables (absolute maximum power p=0.001 r=0.73, relative maximum power p=0.01 r=0.40, absolute mean power p=0.001 r=0.83, relative mean power p=0.03 r=0.37, Fatigue index r=0.33 p=0.05). On the other hand, the correlation of RAAT and RAST was significant (absolute maximum power r=0.88 p=0.001, relative maximum power p=0.001 r=0.77, absolute mean power r=0.91 p=0.001, relative mean power p=0.001 r=0.80, absolute minimum power r=0.77 p=0.001, relative minimum power p=0.003 r=0.47, Fatigue index r=0.43 p=0.009). Reliability of RAAT and RAST TEST showed in all aspect (absolute maximum power’s reliability in RAAT r=0.96 p=0.001, absolute maximum power’s reliability in RAST r=0.97 p=0.001). The results showed that the RAAT has sufficient validity. Also the RAAT and RAST TEST are Reliable.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SABERI KAKHKI, ALIREZA, RAJABI, HAMID, & MOHAMMADNIA AHMADI, MOHSEN. (2010). THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE RAAT AND RAST ANAEROBIC TEST IN ESTIMATING OF ANAEROBIC POWER. JOURNAL OF MOVEMENT SCIENCE & SPORTS, 7(14), 51-59. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/74871/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SABERI KAKHKI ALIREZA, RAJABI HAMID, MOHAMMADNIA AHMADI MOHSEN. THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE RAAT AND RAST ANAEROBIC TEST IN ESTIMATING OF ANAEROBIC POWER. JOURNAL OF MOVEMENT SCIENCE & SPORTS[Internet]. 2010;7(14):51-59. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/74871/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA SABERI KAKHKI, HAMID RAJABI, and MOHSEN MOHAMMADNIA AHMADI, “THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE RAAT AND RAST ANAEROBIC TEST IN ESTIMATING OF ANAEROBIC POWER,” JOURNAL OF MOVEMENT SCIENCE & SPORTS, vol. 7, no. 14, pp. 51–59, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/74871/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button