Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

119
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

53
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

In-Vitro Comparative Study of the Effect of Four Finishing and Polishing Tools on Surface Roughness of a Microhybrid Resin

Pages

  26-31

Abstract

 Background and Aim: The complications of unwanted surface roughness of composite restorations are highly common due to the increasing use of this restorative material. Therefore, the present study was designed to compare the effect of four finishing and polishing (F&P) tools on surface roughness of microhybrid resin composites. Materials and Methods: This experimental study was performed on 42 samples of CLEARFIL™ AP-X microhybrid composite, which were divided into four groups of different F&P methods and one control group as follows: control (n=2), Flexi-D discs (n=10), Flexi-D + diamond polishing paste (n=10), Intensive twisted rubber polisher (n=10), and Rubber Polisher Teco (n=10). The samples were examined by profilometry. Surface roughness (Ra) of each specimen was measured at three points, and the mean value was considered as surface roughness. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc statistical tests. Results: The surface roughness of composite discs in an ascending order was as follows: control (0. 048± 0. 014 μ m), Flexi-D disc (0. 179± 0. 132 μ m), Intensive twisted rubber polisher (0. 233± 0. 105 μ m), Flexi-D disc with diamond polishing paste (0. 232± 0. 141 μ m), and Rubber Polisher Teco (0. 251± 0. 087 μ m; P=0. 001). The difference between the two groups of Flexi-D disc with diamond polishing paste and Rubber Polisher Teco was not statistically significant (P=0. 742). The level of surface roughness in Flexi-D samples was significantly lower than that of the other samples (P<0. 05). Conclusion: It seems that the Flexi-D disc is the best F&P tool for microhybrid resin composites.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

Nemati Anarakiu, S., KAZEMI, H., GHAFARI, Z., Naser, Z., & BITARAF, T.. (2019). In-Vitro Comparative Study of the Effect of Four Finishing and Polishing Tools on Surface Roughness of a Microhybrid Resin. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES, 4(2), 26-31. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/753605/en

Vancouver: Copy

Nemati Anarakiu S., KAZEMI H., GHAFARI Z., Naser Z., BITARAF T.. In-Vitro Comparative Study of the Effect of Four Finishing and Polishing Tools on Surface Roughness of a Microhybrid Resin. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2019;4(2):26-31. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/753605/en

IEEE: Copy

S. Nemati Anarakiu, H. KAZEMI, Z. GHAFARI, Z. Naser, and T. BITARAF, “In-Vitro Comparative Study of the Effect of Four Finishing and Polishing Tools on Surface Roughness of a Microhybrid Resin,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 26–31, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/753605/en

Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top