مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

121
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

100
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Clinical Outcomes of Open versus Arthroscopic Surgery for Lateral Epicondylitis, Evidence from a Systematic Review (SYSTEMATIC REVIEW)

Pages

  91-104

Abstract

 Background: Lateral epicondylitis (LE) also known as Tennis elbow is a common disease of middle-aged population. Surgery is a treatment of choice in patients not responded to the conservative management. Open and arthroscopic release are the two main choices for LE surgery; however, an overall consensus is not available. This study was aimed to compare the clinical outcomes after conventional open and arthroscopic procedures. Methods: An electronic search of databases including, Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus was conducted to identify all eligible studies describing the post-operative clinical outcomes of patients with LE, up to October 2018. All studies considering the non-pediatric cases who received at least 6-month preoperative conservative treatment and were followed more than 6 months after surgery were included. Data on patient satisfaction, functional outcomes, pain, and complication rates, were extracted for each study. If appropriate, the meta-analysis was performed to combine the results for all outcomes that were reported in a minimum of 3 studies utilizing the same surgical technique. Results: A total of 34 eligible articles including 15 open studies, 13 arthroscopic studies, and 6 studies in both techniques were enrolled. Studies were from different parts of the world with a whole sample size of 1508 cases. Various outcome measuring methods including Quick DASH and VAS, and different clinical outcomes were reported. The results indicated no significant difference between arthroscopic and Open surgery methods in terms of VAS, DASH score, time for returning to work, overall outcomes, and patients’ satisfaction (P >0. 05). However, postoperative complications were significantly higher in the open group when compared with the arthroscopic procedure (57. 3% vs 33. 4% P=0. 001). Conclusion: The present study suggests that despite no superiority for each techniques regarding the pain relief, subjective function, and better rehabilitation, arthroscopic method have been associated with less complications.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    MORADI, ALI, Pasdar, Pouria, Mehrad Majd, Hassan, & EBRAHIMZADEH, MOHAMMAD H.. (2019). Clinical Outcomes of Open versus Arthroscopic Surgery for Lateral Epicondylitis, Evidence from a Systematic Review (SYSTEMATIC REVIEW). THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, 7(2), 91-104. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/755071/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MORADI ALI, Pasdar Pouria, Mehrad Majd Hassan, EBRAHIMZADEH MOHAMMAD H.. Clinical Outcomes of Open versus Arthroscopic Surgery for Lateral Epicondylitis, Evidence from a Systematic Review (SYSTEMATIC REVIEW). THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY[Internet]. 2019;7(2):91-104. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/755071/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALI MORADI, Pouria Pasdar, Hassan Mehrad Majd, and MOHAMMAD H. EBRAHIMZADEH, “Clinical Outcomes of Open versus Arthroscopic Surgery for Lateral Epicondylitis, Evidence from a Systematic Review (SYSTEMATIC REVIEW),” THE ARCHIVES OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 91–104, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/755071/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button