SONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF BLADDER WALL THICKNESS IN HEALTHY CHILDREN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SORKHI H.; NAVAEIFAR M.R.; NOUR ALDINI H.GH.; ALIZADEH NAVAEI R.; SHAFI HAMID; HADIPOUR ABAS

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Pediatrics Year:2009 | Volume:19 | Issue:4 Page(s): 341-346

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

19,305

Download:

171

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF BLADDER WALL THICKNESS IN HEALTHY CHILDREN

Author(s)

Keywords

CHILDRENQ3

BLADDER WALL THICKNESSQ3

ULTRASONOGRAPHYQ3

BLADDERQ3

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the ultrasonographic (US) BLADDER WALL THICKNESS/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> BLADDER WALL THICKNESS (BWT) in normal CHILDREN.Methods: In 106 CHILDREN (54 boys and 52 girls, aged 8 months to 15 years) without any history and laboratory findings of BLADDER dysfunction or infection, US measurement of BLADDER points was performed with BLADDER filled to at least 50% of its expected capacity.Findings: The mean thickness of four BLADDER wall points was 1.79±0.28 mm. The mean anterior wall thickness was 1.5±0.31 mm (range 0.9-2.2 mm), posterior 2±0.36 mm (range 1.2-3.1 mm), right lateral 1.8±0.34 mm (ranges 0.8-3mm) and left lateral 1.8±0.36mm (range 1-3mm). There was a significant difference between BLADDER sites (P<0.05) except between lateral sites.Conclusion: We recommend after measurement of four points, to compare these values with normal±2SD curves according to age.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SORKHI, H., NAVAEIFAR, M.R., NOUR ALDINI, H.GH., ALIZADEH NAVAEI, R., SHAFI, HAMID, & HADIPOUR, ABAS. (2009). SONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF BLADDER WALL THICKNESS IN HEALTHY CHILDREN. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 19(4), 341-346. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/76007/en

Vancouver: Copy

SORKHI H., NAVAEIFAR M.R., NOUR ALDINI H.GH., ALIZADEH NAVAEI R., SHAFI HAMID, HADIPOUR ABAS. SONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF BLADDER WALL THICKNESS IN HEALTHY CHILDREN. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS[Internet]. 2009;19(4):341-346. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/76007/en

IEEE: Copy

H. SORKHI, M.R. NAVAEIFAR, H.GH. NOUR ALDINI, R. ALIZADEH NAVAEI, HAMID SHAFI, and ABAS HADIPOUR, “SONOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENT OF BLADDER WALL THICKNESS IN HEALTHY CHILDREN,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 341–346, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/76007/en

Related Journal Papers