مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

170
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

81
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Clinical guidelines: an evidence-based debate

Pages

  92-96

Abstract

 Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of debate as a learning tool for changing audiences’ views regarding the use of clinical guidelines in routine Clinical practice. Methods: A debate scenario including different rationales for and against using guidelines in Clinical practice, presented by the student section of Iranian Evidence Based Medicine Center of Excellence, was held at the first International Student Congress of Research Integrity and Evidence-Based Practice (Kish Island, Iran, December, 2015). The audience was first asked to check the papers given to them, and if they agreed to the terms, they were asked to choose, “ Yes” , “ No” , or “ I don’ t know” . Results: Of the 400 individuals participating in the congress, 100 were present during the scheduled debate time. Among the 71 people completing pretest questionnaires, 73% (52) answered “ yes” to the question, “ Should we use guidelines? ” About 7% (5) claimed that we shouldn’ t use guidelines, and 20% (14) had no opinion about using them. Following the debate, the participants who chose “ yes” to the guidelines remained in favor of their use in Clinical practice. Of the 14 who did not have an opinion for guideline use, all agreed to use guidelines in Clinical practice. Surprisingly, the five participants who were against guideline implementation remained fixed in their view, continuing to disagree regarding their use in clinical encounters. Conclusion: Although we were unable to change the attitudes of physicians who were against the use of guidelines in Clinical practice, the debate caused a positive shift among participants who did not have an opinion regarding their use in clinical scenarios.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    FARHADI, FERESHTEH, Abbasi Asl, Masoumeh, TALESCHIAN TABRIZI, NEGAR, HAJEBRAHIMI, MOHAMMADALI, Mostafaie, Hadi, & HAJEBRAHIMI, SAKINEH. (2019). Clinical guidelines: an evidence-based debate. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, 8(2), 92-96. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/764884/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    FARHADI FERESHTEH, Abbasi Asl Masoumeh, TALESCHIAN TABRIZI NEGAR, HAJEBRAHIMI MOHAMMADALI, Mostafaie Hadi, HAJEBRAHIMI SAKINEH. Clinical guidelines: an evidence-based debate. RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2019;8(2):92-96. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/764884/en

    IEEE: Copy

    FERESHTEH FARHADI, Masoumeh Abbasi Asl, NEGAR TALESCHIAN TABRIZI, MOHAMMADALI HAJEBRAHIMI, Hadi Mostafaie, and SAKINEH HAJEBRAHIMI, “Clinical guidelines: an evidence-based debate,” RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 92–96, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/764884/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button