مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

141
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

79
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Iranian EFL Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback with a Focus on Teaching Experience

Pages

  247-271

Abstract

 The purpose of this study was to find the Iranian less and more experi-enced EFL teachers' beliefs in marking students' errors in writing, their preferred types of written corrective feedback, the most useful kind of teachers' written error correction feedback, and the differences between what they believe and what they actually do in giving feedback. The study was done by the cooperation of 120 available university teachers (53 less experienced and 67 more experienced) teaching writing to EFL learners at different universities in Iran. A written feedback questionnaire was employed in this descriptive survey in which both quantitative (closedended questions and paper investigation) and qualitative (open-ended questions) ways of data collection were used. Descriptive statistics including frequency and percentage were estimated in the quantitative data analysis. The results revealed that in error marking and in finding the most useful kind of error correction, less and more experienced teachers had different preferences; and for pointing out the errors, they also had different ideas. The reviewing of the open-ended questions for the qualitative data showed no belief discrepancies in teachers’ responses to the closed-ended items and open-ended questions of the questionnaire. However, the investigation of teachers’ error correction on learners’ actual papers indicated that both groups’ beliefs were different from their actual paper correction. The implications of the study are for teachers, policymakers, and decision-makers in educational settings.

Multimedia

  • No record.

    • Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Golpour, Farhad, Ahour, Touran, & AHANGARI, SAEIDEH. (2020). Iranian EFL Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback with a Focus on Teaching Experience. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE HORIZONS, 4(1 (Serial No. 7)), 247-271. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/768380/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Golpour Farhad, Ahour Touran, AHANGARI SAEIDEH. Iranian EFL Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback with a Focus on Teaching Experience. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE HORIZONS[Internet]. 2020;4(1 (Serial No. 7)):247-271. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/768380/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Farhad Golpour, Touran Ahour, and SAEIDEH AHANGARI, “Iranian EFL Teachers' Beliefs and Practices Regarding Written Corrective Feedback with a Focus on Teaching Experience,” JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE HORIZONS, vol. 4, no. 1 (Serial No. 7), pp. 247–271, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/768380/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button