COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND COMPLICATIONS GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PCNL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MEHRABI S.; AKBARTABAR M.; SABERINEZHAD A.A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Armaghane Danesh Year:2010 | Volume:15 | Issue:2 (58) Page(s): 95-105

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

811

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND COMPLICATIONS GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PCNL

Author(s)

MEHRABI S. | AKBARTABAR M. | SABERINEZHAD A.A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PERCUTANEOUSNEPHROLITHOTOMYQ2

GENERAL ANESTHESIAQ3

SPINAL ANESTHESIAQ2

COMPLICATIONSQ3

Abstract

Introduction & Objective: Complication of GENERAL ANESTHESIA, especially during change of position, is more than SPINAL ANESTHESIA. We evaluated our experience regarding SPINAL ANESTHESIA in comparison to GENERAL ANESTHESIA in patients older than 18 years old that were candidate for PCNL.Materials & Methods: In this randomized clinical trial study, from March 2008 to February 2010, 110 patients older than 18 years who were candidate for PCNL, after informing them and getting their approval, they were randomly assigned into two groups by Zelen randomization method. Then, in group 1, GENERAL ANESTHESIA was induced by parental and inhalational drugs as standard methods and PCNl was performed in prone position under fluoroscopy guidance by standard technique. In group 2, SPINAL ANESTHESIA was done by spinal needle NO 23-25 gauge and injecting 2-3 ml of Bupivacaine and 0.5 ml Fentanyl in spinal space L4 in sitting position. Then urethral catheter was inserted in lithotomic position and head of bed tilted down for 5-10 minutes with checking level of anesthesia. Then, the patients were rotated easily by the help of in prone position and PCNL were done under guide of fluoroscopy by standard technique and results with COMPLICATIONS were recorded and analyzed by SPSS software and chi-square and T Student tests.Results: Mean stone size in group one and two were 34.2±9.8 and 31.3±7.9 millimeters respectively. Considering efficacy and successfulness of operation, clearance of system from stones or residual stones <5 millimeter was respectively 80 and 72.73 percent in groups 1 and 2 (p=.37. There were no major Intra-operative or postoperative COMPLICATIONS such as visceral or vascular injury and unusual bleeding in our patients. Need to narcotic drugs in operative day (D0) in groups 1 and 2 were 12.4±3.1 and 7.8±2.3 milligram equivalent to morphine sulphate (p=.03). The coast of anesthetic drugs in groups 1 and 2 were 23±3.7 and 4.5±1.3$ respectively (p=.001).Conclusion: SPINAL ANESTHESIA with combined Bupivacaine and Fentanyl is safe, effective, and also a comfortable method for performing PCNL and is a good alternative for GENERAL ANESTHESIA in adult patients with low coast.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MEHRABI, S., AKBARTABAR, M., & SABERINEZHAD, A.A.. (2010). COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND COMPLICATIONS GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PCNL. ARMAGHAN DANESH, 15(2 (58)), 95-105. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/77503/en

Vancouver: Copy

MEHRABI S., AKBARTABAR M., SABERINEZHAD A.A.. COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND COMPLICATIONS GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PCNL. ARMAGHAN DANESH[Internet]. 2010;15(2 (58)):95-105. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/77503/en

IEEE: Copy

S. MEHRABI, M. AKBARTABAR, and A.A. SABERINEZHAD, “COMPARISON OF EFFICACY AND COMPLICATIONS GENERAL VERSUS SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN PCNL,” ARMAGHAN DANESH, vol. 15, no. 2 (58), pp. 95–105, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/77503/en

Related Journal Papers