COMPARISON OF RADIOFREQUENCY BIPOLAR CAUTERY FOR TONSILLECTOMY USE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HASHEMI S.B.; ASEFI S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Armaghane Danesh Year:2013 | Volume:17 | Issue:6 (72) Page(s): 477-483

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

794

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF RADIOFREQUENCY BIPOLAR CAUTERY FOR TONSILLECTOMY USE

Author(s)

HASHEMI S.B. | ASEFI S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TONSILLECTOMYQ3

RADIOFREQUENCYQ2

PAINQ2

BLEEDINGQ3

Abstract

Background & aim: TONSILLECTOMY as one of the most prevalent surgical operations in otolaryngology is followed by great PAIN and absences from school and work in most patients. The aim of the present study was a comparison of RADIOFREQUENCY bipolar cautery in TONSILLECTOMY use.Methods: This clinical trial study was conducted on 33 patients older than 10 years-old candidate for TONSILLECTOMY. RADIOFREQUENCY and Bipolar techniques were performed on the right and left tonsils of each studied patient, respectively. Data on PAIN, BLEEDING, operation duration and hardness was collected and analyzed by SPSS software, version 15. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: BLEEDING volume did not statistically differ between two techniques while for other studied factors, statistically significant differences were observed in favor of RADIOFREQUENCY method (P<0.05). The mean PAIN intensity in the RADIOFREQUENCY procedures on different days after surgery was significantly lower than that of bipolar cautery (P<0.05).Conclusion: Due to our results, the mean score of post-TONSILLECTOMY PAIN was significantly less following RADIOFREQUENCY technique in compare with bipolar technique.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HASHEMI, S.B., & ASEFI, S.. (2013). COMPARISON OF RADIOFREQUENCY BIPOLAR CAUTERY FOR TONSILLECTOMY USE. ARMAGHAN DANESH, 17(6 (72)), 477-483. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/77748/en

Vancouver: Copy

HASHEMI S.B., ASEFI S.. COMPARISON OF RADIOFREQUENCY BIPOLAR CAUTERY FOR TONSILLECTOMY USE. ARMAGHAN DANESH[Internet]. 2013;17(6 (72)):477-483. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/77748/en

IEEE: Copy

S.B. HASHEMI, and S. ASEFI, “COMPARISON OF RADIOFREQUENCY BIPOLAR CAUTERY FOR TONSILLECTOMY USE,” ARMAGHAN DANESH, vol. 17, no. 6 (72), pp. 477–483, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/77748/en

Related Journal Papers