COMPARISON OF SALIVARY AND SERUM IGG ANTIBODY IN DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NASR ELAHEI M.; MALEKI I.; KHALILIAN A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

3,956

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF SALIVARY AND SERUM IGG ANTIBODY IN DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI

Author(s)

NASR ELAHEI M. | MALEKI I. | KHALILIAN A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ENDOSCOPYQ4

HELICOBACTER PYLORIQ4

IGG ANTIBODYQ2

ELIZAQ2

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Most of the diagnostic methods of HELICOBACTER PYLORI infection are invasive and time consuming. This study compared salivary IgG with serum IgG in diagnosis of H.pylori infection in dyspeptic patients in order to search for a non-invasive, cheaper and more tolerable method. Materials and Methods: In a cross sectional diagnostic study, during one year (Feb. 2002-Feb 2003) 200 consecutive patients (age range 11-83) referring to Immam Khomeini Hospital. For upper gastroduodenal ENDOSCOPY were recruited. Three biopsy specimens were obtained from antrum and body of the stomach and three from duodenum. Histological examination (Hematoxylin - Eosin and Gimsa), rapid urease test and culture were performed. Saliva and serum were obtained before ENDOSCOPY and IgG ntibody level were detemined by ELIZA using Randim Kit (Roma, Italy). Sensitivity, specificity,positive and engative predictive values were evaluated by SPSS soft ware. Results: Salivary IgG correctly identified 120 out of 146 H.pylori infected patients (82%). Salivary IgG assay showed high sensitivity in the detection ofH.pylori infected patients (88.2%). Specificity and positive predictive value of salivary IgG were higher than those of serum (84.4% versus 83.1% and 92.3% versus 91.9%). Conclusion: Salivary IgG assay can be used as an alternative to other non-invasive methods for screening of H.pylori infected patients.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NASR ELAHEI, M., MALEKI, I., & KHALILIAN, A.. (2003). COMPARISON OF SALIVARY AND SERUM IGG ANTIBODY IN DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI. JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 5(11), 36-41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/79178/en

Vancouver: Copy

NASR ELAHEI M., MALEKI I., KHALILIAN A.. COMPARISON OF SALIVARY AND SERUM IGG ANTIBODY IN DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI. JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2003;5(11):36-41. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/79178/en

IEEE: Copy

M. NASR ELAHEI, I. MALEKI, and A. KHALILIAN, “COMPARISON OF SALIVARY AND SERUM IGG ANTIBODY IN DIAGNOSIS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI,” JOURNAL OF GORGAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 36–41, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/79178/en

Related Journal Papers