مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,044
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON OF PROBING WITH AIR INJECTION AND PROBING WITH IRRIGATION IN CHILDREN WITH CONGENITAL NASOLACHRYMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION

Pages

  154-158

Abstract

 Background and Purpose: CONGENITAL NOSOLACHRYMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION is one of the common disorders characterized by tearing and mucoid or mucopurulent discharge in children. The most common site of obstruction is the Hasner Value. About 20% of infants suffer from tearing which spontaneously improves within the first year of life in 90%. As there is no risk of aspiration with the AIR INJECTION, it was adopted for comparison with saline injection. Therefore, this research was conducted to compare the success rate of the conventional method (probing with IRRIGATION) and the AIR INJECTION in infants.Methods and Materials: This study was conducted as clinical trial in which 61 patients (with the age range of 9-24 months) (76 eyes) with CONGENITAL NOSOLACHRYMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION, not responding to conservative treatment, was randomly assigned into one of the two groups. They were assessed before and after probing using Munk's scale. Their follow-up included lachrymal massage and antibiotic drops and assessment in 2 weeks, one month and three months after probing. A few cases were excluded from the study for irregular follow-up participations. Chisquare was used for data analysis.Results: Out of 34 male eyes and 42 female eyes, 33 and 42 eyes recovered respectively upon the final follow-up (three months after probing). Out of 30 patients probed with saline, after two weeks, 31 eyes (86.1%) recovered after two weeks; 34 eyes (94.4%) after one month and 34 eyes (94.4%) after three months. Out of 31 patients poobed with AIR INJECTION, the recovery rates after two weeks, one month and three months follow-up, 33 eyes (82.5%), 38 eyes (95%) and 38 (95%) respectively. Conclusion: As three is no risk of aspiration with the AIR INJECTION and the outcomes are similar to the IRRIGATION method, the researchers recommend probing with AIR INJECTION to be substituted to saline IRRIGATION.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    HEYDARI, BEHROUZ, YAGHOUBI, GH.H., DAVARI, M.H., MIRI, M.R., & MASOUDIAN, H.. (2007). THE COMPARISON OF PROBING WITH AIR INJECTION AND PROBING WITH IRRIGATION IN CHILDREN WITH CONGENITAL NASOLACHRYMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 14(3 (45)), 154-158. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/82306/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HEYDARI BEHROUZ, YAGHOUBI GH.H., DAVARI M.H., MIRI M.R., MASOUDIAN H.. THE COMPARISON OF PROBING WITH AIR INJECTION AND PROBING WITH IRRIGATION IN CHILDREN WITH CONGENITAL NASOLACHRYMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2007;14(3 (45)):154-158. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/82306/en

    IEEE: Copy

    BEHROUZ HEYDARI, GH.H. YAGHOUBI, M.H. DAVARI, M.R. MIRI, and H. MASOUDIAN, “THE COMPARISON OF PROBING WITH AIR INJECTION AND PROBING WITH IRRIGATION IN CHILDREN WITH CONGENITAL NASOLACHRYMAL DUCT OBSTRUCTION,” JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 14, no. 3 (45), pp. 154–158, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/82306/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button