COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ENTERIC PATHOGENIC BACTERIA

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHASHEEI R.; GHORBANI E.; EBRAHIMZADEH S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences Year:2000 | Volume:7 | Issue:1 (15) Page(s): 20-28

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,085

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ENTERIC PATHOGENIC BACTERIA

Author(s)

KHASHEEI R. | GHORBANI E. | EBRAHIMZADEH S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ANTIBIOTIC SENSITIVITYQ4

BACTERIAQ2

SUMMERQ4

SABZEVARQ3

Abstract

Arteriogram test is a necessary test for selecting antibiotics in treating infections, so that resistance strains are prevented. In this study, arteriogram test was carried out with both the Standard Kirby-Bauer (Disk Diffusion) and the conventional routine methods on 36 pathogens isolated from gastroenteritis infections. The most common pathogenic BACTERIA were E.coli and Shigella. The results of EPEC strains in the standard method indicated that the highest sensitivity and resistance were NA, AN (81.8%) and CN (72.7%), while in the conventional method the results were NA (72.7%) and AM (91%). In Shigella strains, the highest resistance and sensitivity were SXT, TE (100%) and NA (100%) respectively. The most resistant antibiotic pattern in E.coli strains were TE+SXT+AM with a 25% frequency. Also, in Shigella strains, the most frequent pattern (40%) was SXT+TE+AM+GM. On the whole, 30.5% triple resistance was identified among the 36 isolated pathogens. On the basis of the results, we concluded that there is a relatively significant difference with respect to the use of the two methods; also, TE and SXT are not selective antibiotics in gastroenteritis, especially in Shigellosis.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KHASHEEI, R., GHORBANI, E., & EBRAHIMZADEH, S.. (2000). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ENTERIC PATHOGENIC BACTERIA. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 7(1 (15)), 20-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/82472/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHASHEEI R., GHORBANI E., EBRAHIMZADEH S.. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ENTERIC PATHOGENIC BACTERIA. JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2000;7(1 (15)):20-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/82472/en

IEEE: Copy

R. KHASHEEI, E. GHORBANI, and S. EBRAHIMZADEH, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ANTIBIOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY OF ENTERIC PATHOGENIC BACTERIA,” JOURNAL OF SABZEVAR UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 7, no. 1 (15), pp. 20–28, 2000, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/82472/en

Related Journal Papers