A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS OF SUICIDAL AND NON-SUICIDAL DEPRESSED PATIENTS WITH NON-CLINICAL SAMPLE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AHMADIAN GORJI M.; FATA L.; ASGHARNEZHAD FARID A.A.; MALAKOUTI SEYED KAZEM

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Advances in Cognitive Sciences Year:2009 | Volume:10 | Issue:4 (40) Page(s): 49-59

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,644

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS OF SUICIDAL AND NON-SUICIDAL DEPRESSED PATIENTS WITH NON-CLINICAL SAMPLE

Author(s)

AHMADIAN GORJI M. | FATA L. | ASGHARNEZHAD FARID A.A. | MALAKOUTI SEYED KAZEM | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMASQ3

SUICIDEQ2

MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDERQ2

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of the current study was to compare the schema content of suicidal depressed patients, non-suicidal depressed patients, and non-clinical samples.Based on schema theory (Young, Klosko & Weishaar, 2002), it was expected that schema content differences would likely be obtained on variables including defectiveness/ shame, social isolation/ alienation, vulnerability and failure. Method: In order to evaluate these hypothese, the Young Schema Questionnaire was distributed among three different groups of participants.A total of 63 participants took part in this study, including 16 patients with MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER who had recently (in the past 3 weeks) attempted SUICIDE, 22 nonsuicidal patients with MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, and 25 non-clinical participants. Group status was confirmed using the SCID and scores on the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ). Sampling was arranged so that there was no significant difference among groups according to age, education, gender or marital status. All participants completed the Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ) 232-item version, and the BDI-II. The YSQ is a comprehensive measure of dysfunctional schemas, and generate scores on 18 schema dimensions in 5 domains. Data were analyzed using MANOVA and MANCOVA, with Tukey post-hoc comparisons and Bonferroni corrections, as appropriate. Results: Findings of the current study indicated overall significant differences among groups on the YSQ schemas. Post hoc analyses indicated that the YSQ differentiated the two depressed groups from the non-clinical participants in all schemas. The two depressed groups were differentiated, however, only on dimensions of “emotional deprivation “dependence/ incompetence”, “vulnerability to harm and illness. Discussion: The results of the current study are congruent with schema theory of depression, in that a number of predicted differences between suicidal and non-suicidal depressed patients were observed. The vulnerability schema appears to be a critical aspect of SUICIDE risk in depressed patients. Results of the current study support differences in schematic cognitive structures of suicidal depressed, non-suicidal-depressed, and non-clinical sample. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings, but the results imply that schema-focused interventions may be relevant to reducing risk of suicidal behavior in depressed patients.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

AHMADIAN GORJI, M., FATA, L., ASGHARNEZHAD FARID, A.A., & MALAKOUTI, SEYED KAZEM. (2009). A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS OF SUICIDAL AND NON-SUICIDAL DEPRESSED PATIENTS WITH NON-CLINICAL SAMPLE. ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 10(4 (40)), 49-59. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/83081/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHMADIAN GORJI M., FATA L., ASGHARNEZHAD FARID A.A., MALAKOUTI SEYED KAZEM. A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS OF SUICIDAL AND NON-SUICIDAL DEPRESSED PATIENTS WITH NON-CLINICAL SAMPLE. ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE[Internet]. 2009;10(4 (40)):49-59. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/83081/en

IEEE: Copy

M. AHMADIAN GORJI, L. FATA, A.A. ASGHARNEZHAD FARID, and SEYED KAZEM MALAKOUTI, “A COMPARISON OF THE EARLY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS OF SUICIDAL AND NON-SUICIDAL DEPRESSED PATIENTS WITH NON-CLINICAL SAMPLE,” ADVANCES IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, vol. 10, no. 4 (40), pp. 49–59, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/83081/en

Related Journal Papers