COMPARISON OF CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE WITH THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ASLANI HAMID REZA; ALIZADEH KHALIL; KARIMI AMIN; ABDKARIMI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN; ZAFERANI ZOHREH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY Year:2009 | Volume:7 | Issue:4 (29) Page(s): 161-166

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

912

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE WITH THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES

Author(s)

Keywords

CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROMEQ3

METHODSQ3

THERAPYQ2

Abstract

Background: CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME is one of the most common compression neuropathies in the upper limb and requires surgery if conservative treatment fails. This article compares the result of regular open incision, midpalmar mini incision and endoscopic technique in carpal tunnel release.Methods: This is a clinical trial study on 53 patients (5 males, 48 females) within one year, who were surgical candidates. The surgery was done by arthroscopy, with regular open incision or with mid palmar small incision. The clinical outcomes were evaluated one week, 4 weeks and 4 months post surgery.Results: Relief and satisfaction were better in the first month in the arthroscopic and mini-incision group. All 3 techniques had similar outcomes after 4 months. In 4-months follow-up, night pain relief, followed by parasthesia relief were the ones with the best improvement. Weakness was the symptom with the least improvement. Longer incision cases were associated with more delay to return to work.Conclusion: Carpal tunnel release with endoscopic and mini incision techniques have a better early satisfaction rates compared to regular open incision, but no difference is seen between the two groups after four months.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ASLANI, HAMID REZA, ALIZADEH, KHALIL, KARIMI, AMIN, ABDKARIMI, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, & ZAFERANI, ZOHREH. (2009). COMPARISON OF CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE WITH THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 7(4 (29)), 161-166. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/85519/en

Vancouver: Copy

ASLANI HAMID REZA, ALIZADEH KHALIL, KARIMI AMIN, ABDKARIMI MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN, ZAFERANI ZOHREH. COMPARISON OF CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE WITH THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY[Internet]. 2009;7(4 (29)):161-166. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/85519/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMID REZA ASLANI, KHALIL ALIZADEH, AMIN KARIMI, MOHAMMAD HOSSEIN ABDKARIMI, and ZOHREH ZAFERANI, “COMPARISON OF CARPAL TUNNEL RELEASE WITH THREE DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, vol. 7, no. 4 (29), pp. 161–166, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/85519/en

Related Journal Papers