مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

554
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON PCR AND CULTURE METHODS FOR DETECT COCCOID FORMS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI

Pages

  175-181

Abstract

 Background: HELICOBACTER PYLORI (Pylori) was the most common cause of chronic gastritis and was linked to peptic ulcer disease and gastric cancer. Environmental factors such as water a reservoir of H.pylori which infect human. a Non-culture bacteria in COCCOID forms widespread in aquatic environments.The objective of this study was elevating the diagnostic value of PCR and CULTURE methods for for diagnosis COCCOID forms of H.pylori.Materials and Methods: To induce COCCOID forms, ten different strains of H.pylori (H1-H10) were inoculated into 30 drinking water samples. Then, the samples were incubated at three different temperatures of 4oC, 22oC and 37oC for the durations of 30 and 60 days. The samples were CULTUREd on brucella blood agar and DNA was also extracted also from them and PCR performed on samples.Results: percentage of H.pylori cells detected at specified temperatures by the CULTURE were 0%, 10% and 0% in the first month and were 0%,10%,30% in the second month whereas by the PCR molecular method were 30%, 80%, and 30% in the first month and were 20%, 20%, and 40% in the second month, respectively.Conclusion: finding show PCR methodis more capable than CULTURE fordetect the COCCOID forms of H.pylori, therefore this method could be used to detect non- CULTURE forms.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    ALLAHKARAMI, SOMAYEH, SHAHHOSSEINY, MOHAMMAD HASSAN, HAYATI ROODBARI, NASIM, & ESMAILI, DAVOOD. (2014). COMPARISON PCR AND CULTURE METHODS FOR DETECT COCCOID FORMS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI. GOVARESH JOURNAL, 19(3), 175-181. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/86181/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ALLAHKARAMI SOMAYEH, SHAHHOSSEINY MOHAMMAD HASSAN, HAYATI ROODBARI NASIM, ESMAILI DAVOOD. COMPARISON PCR AND CULTURE METHODS FOR DETECT COCCOID FORMS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI. GOVARESH JOURNAL[Internet]. 2014;19(3):175-181. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/86181/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SOMAYEH ALLAHKARAMI, MOHAMMAD HASSAN SHAHHOSSEINY, NASIM HAYATI ROODBARI, and DAVOOD ESMAILI, “COMPARISON PCR AND CULTURE METHODS FOR DETECT COCCOID FORMS OF HELICOBACTER PYLORI,” GOVARESH JOURNAL, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 175–181, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/86181/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button