A COMPARATIVE CRITIQUE OF KANT AND FOUCAULT'S THEORIES OF MORALITY AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR MORAL EDUCATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAJADI SEYED MAHDI; ALIABADI A.A.F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF EDUCATION Year:2008 | Volume:24 | Issue:1 (93) Page(s): 137-164

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,911

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE CRITIQUE OF KANT AND FOUCAULT'S THEORIES OF MORALITY AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR MORAL EDUCATION

Author(s)

SAJADI SEYED MAHDI | ALIABADI A.A.F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

KANTQ2

LIBERTYQ2

PRACTICAL WISDOMQ2

FOUCAULTQ3

DIALOGUEQ2

MORAL EDUCATIONQ1

Abstract

According to the KANT's view there are two types of wisdom: theoretical and practical. It is the PRACTICAL WISDOM that issues moral commands. Because of his wisdom, man senses a moral obligation to engage in moral behaviors. That is to say that KANT believed morality as being rooted in PRACTICAL WISDOM which is equipped with will, and hence, his morality is wisdom based. On the other hand, FOUCAULT is opposed to KANT's idea and considers DIALOGUE with its social and linguistic structure, as the source of morality. FOUCAULT's morality is aesthetically based and as such is not only practical but truly liberating as well, because the individual freely rules his own life. Based on these points of views, it can be said that any KANTian approach to moral training would be rational in nature with a focus on universal principles aiming at the development of a free person. However, approaches based on FOUCAULT's philosophy focus on a morality that is local, special, and void of universality that leads to internal experiences of freedom.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SAJADI, SEYED MAHDI, & ALIABADI, A.A.F.. (2008). A COMPARATIVE CRITIQUE OF KANT AND FOUCAULT'S THEORIES OF MORALITY AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR MORAL EDUCATION. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 24(1 (93)), 137-164. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/87727/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAJADI SEYED MAHDI, ALIABADI A.A.F.. A COMPARATIVE CRITIQUE OF KANT AND FOUCAULT'S THEORIES OF MORALITY AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR MORAL EDUCATION. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION[Internet]. 2008;24(1 (93)):137-164. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/87727/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED MAHDI SAJADI, and A.A.F. ALIABADI, “A COMPARATIVE CRITIQUE OF KANT AND FOUCAULT'S THEORIES OF MORALITY AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR MORAL EDUCATION,” JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, vol. 24, no. 1 (93), pp. 137–164, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/87727/en

Related Journal Papers