Comparison of the Philosophical and Methodological Principles of Khajeh Nasir Tusi and Sadr al-Motaalehin Shirazi in Proving The Most High Necessary Bing

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GANJVAR MAHDI; Mostajeran Ali

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: QABASAT Year:2019 | Volume:24 | Issue:92 Page(s): 127-159

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

308

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of the Philosophical and Methodological Principles of Khajeh Nasir Tusi and Sadr al-Motaalehin Shirazi in Proving The Most High Necessary Bing

Author(s)

GANJVAR MAHDI | Mostajeran Ali | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

methodologyQ2

The Necessary BingQ2

Khajeh Nasir TusiQ1

Sadr al-MotaalehinQ2

proving of GodQ2

Abstract

The issue of proving The Necessary Bing to Muslim scholars is of particular importance, As far as theologians and philosophers have proved such a theme in their books in various ways. Khajeh Tusi also severely under the influence of peripatetic philosophical problems, and entering the content in the theological area, has given another form to the theological issues, so that, how to arrange Khajeh's arguments has been more pronounced than the preceding theologians. But on the contrary, Mulla Sadra, in the light of the establishing rules and principles of His transcendental wisdom, such as the principality of existence, gradation in the reality of existence, etc., has been proposed a new approach to the arguments of God's proof which methodologically can be investigated. Therefore the present paper, while pointing out how the various arguments and methods of Khwajah and Sadra regarding the proof of God, is explains the extent and the way of the philosophical influence of each of these two wise by descriptive-analytic method. Finally, the achievements and agreement and disagreement position of these two thinkers in the basics and methods are discussed.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GANJVAR, MAHDI, & Mostajeran, Ali. (2019). Comparison of the Philosophical and Methodological Principles of Khajeh Nasir Tusi and Sadr al-Motaalehin Shirazi in Proving The Most High Necessary Bing. QABASAT, 24(92 ), 127-159. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/91785/en

Vancouver: Copy

GANJVAR MAHDI, Mostajeran Ali. Comparison of the Philosophical and Methodological Principles of Khajeh Nasir Tusi and Sadr al-Motaalehin Shirazi in Proving The Most High Necessary Bing. QABASAT[Internet]. 2019;24(92 ):127-159. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/91785/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHDI GANJVAR, and Ali Mostajeran, “Comparison of the Philosophical and Methodological Principles of Khajeh Nasir Tusi and Sadr al-Motaalehin Shirazi in Proving The Most High Necessary Bing,” QABASAT, vol. 24, no. 92 , pp. 127–159, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/91785/en

Related Journal Papers