مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

574
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

GOD AND DILEMA OF PHILOSOPHY OF CRITIQUING

Pages

  81-103

Abstract

 In his Critique of Purge Reason, Kant insists that the UNDERSTANDING/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> HUMAN UNDERSTANDING is only able to know phenomena. However, in Critique of Practical Reason, he proves the objective reality of God, freedom and immortality of soul. At first, the result of the two critiques seems to be at odds with each other, with Kant himself calling the problem, the dilemma of philosophy of critiquing. By putting forward and solving the problem, he asserts that the transcendental idealism of phenomena and the supposition of the INTELLIGIBLE WORLD constitute two fundamental pillars of a single philosophy.Based on that, having proved God as a requirement of practical reason in the second critique, he goes on to assign UNDERSTANDING, will and creativity to God as three fundamental determinations. Later, he connects the three fundamental determinations with another determination, which is SPONTANEITY.Kant is on the belief that assigning the determinations to God and proving its existence do not contradict the results of the first critique, resorting occasionally to analogy and to the different applications of categories in the first and second critiques in order to remove the contradiction. Yet, Kant seems unable to remove the contradiction between the two critiques in this way.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    VAEZI, ASGHAR. (2011). GOD AND DILEMA OF PHILOSOPHY OF CRITIQUING. FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY), 38(2), 81-103. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/93693/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    VAEZI ASGHAR. GOD AND DILEMA OF PHILOSOPHY OF CRITIQUING. FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY)[Internet]. 2011;38(2):81-103. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/93693/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ASGHAR VAEZI, “GOD AND DILEMA OF PHILOSOPHY OF CRITIQUING,” FALSAFEH (THE IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY), vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 81–103, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/93693/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button