HOW MUCH CHANGE IN THE 5-REPETITION SIT-TO-STAND TEST IS CONSIDERED REAL IN COMMUNITY DWELLING ELDERLY AND HEALTHY YOUNG ADULTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AZADI F.; PARNIANPOUR M.; SHAKERI H.; KAZEMNEJAD A.; AKBARI KAMRANI A.A.; ARAB AMIR MASOUD; ABDOLLAHI IRAJ

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Salmand: Iranian Journal of Ageing Year:2015 | Volume:9 | Issue:4 Page(s): 252-258

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

934

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HOW MUCH CHANGE IN THE 5-REPETITION SIT-TO-STAND TEST IS CONSIDERED REAL IN COMMUNITY DWELLING ELDERLY AND HEALTHY YOUNG ADULTS

Author(s)

Keywords

ELDERLYQ2

YOUNGQ2

5-REPETITION SITTO-STAND TESTQ2

RELATIVE RELIABILITYQ2

ABSOLUTE RELIABILITYQ2

Abstract

Objectives: Relative and ABSOLUTE RELIABILITY are important aspects of tests that many clinical decisions are based upon. In many cases, the only basis for the decision is RELATIVE RELIABILITY while the ABSOLUTE RELIABILITY is also very important. We aimed to measure and calculate the relative and ABSOLUTE RELIABILITY of the 5-repetition Sit-to-stand test.Methods and Materials: 11 community-dwelling over 65 year-old adults (69.64±3.585) and 20 healthy 20-35 year-old YOUNG adults (28.80±4.15) were evaluated twice with an interval of 2 to 5 days when using the 5-repetition Sit-to-stand test.Results The minimal detectable changes were 29.5 and 3.02 seconds in the seniors and YOUNG adults, respectively. The coeﬃcients of variation were 27% and 19% in the seniors and YOUNG adults, respectively.Conclusion: The results of this study showed that upon assessing progress during treatment sessions or judgment about progression or regression, ELDERLY people must exhibit more change than YOUNGer adults to consider changes to be real and not accidental.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AZADI, F., PARNIANPOUR, M., SHAKERI, H., KAZEMNEJAD, A., AKBARI KAMRANI, A.A., ARAB, AMIR MASOUD, & ABDOLLAHI, IRAJ. (2015). HOW MUCH CHANGE IN THE 5-REPETITION SIT-TO-STAND TEST IS CONSIDERED REAL IN COMMUNITY DWELLING ELDERLY AND HEALTHY YOUNG ADULTS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, 9(4), 252-258. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/95100/en

Vancouver: Copy

AZADI F., PARNIANPOUR M., SHAKERI H., KAZEMNEJAD A., AKBARI KAMRANI A.A., ARAB AMIR MASOUD, ABDOLLAHI IRAJ. HOW MUCH CHANGE IN THE 5-REPETITION SIT-TO-STAND TEST IS CONSIDERED REAL IN COMMUNITY DWELLING ELDERLY AND HEALTHY YOUNG ADULTS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF AGEING[Internet]. 2015;9(4):252-258. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/95100/en

IEEE: Copy

F. AZADI, M. PARNIANPOUR, H. SHAKERI, A. KAZEMNEJAD, A.A. AKBARI KAMRANI, AMIR MASOUD ARAB, and IRAJ ABDOLLAHI, “HOW MUCH CHANGE IN THE 5-REPETITION SIT-TO-STAND TEST IS CONSIDERED REAL IN COMMUNITY DWELLING ELDERLY AND HEALTHY YOUNG ADULTS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF AGEING, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 252–258, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/95100/en

Related Journal Papers