مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

175
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

In vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Periapical Direct Digital Radiography in

Pages

  45-51

Abstract

 Background and Objective: Between 0. 5 to 7% of injuries in permanent teeth include root fractures. If left without diagnosis, tooth will become non-vital and subsequent necrotic pulp leads to loss of the tooth. Diagnosis is based on radiography (a radiolucent line /lines) and mobility of coronal segment of tooth. In this study accuracy of Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was compared with periapical direct digital radiography (CCD) in evaluation of Horizontal root fracture in single root teeth. Materials and Methods: This in vitro study was performed on 90 recently extracted single root teeth. In study group horizontal fractures (45 teeth) were done by applying mechanical force of hammer and the each two broken segment were stuck together by glue and then imaging performed by CCD and CBCT. The images were evaluated by two radiologists as a single blind study. Results were analyzed by SPSS software version 22. To comparing sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value using Wilcoxon and MC Nemar analysis and Spearman’ s correlation coefficient were calculated. Results: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value in CBCT were 97. 8%, 95. 6%, 93% 92% respectively and CCD were 86. 7%, 66. 7%, 80% and 85% respectively. Accuracy of CBCT was 93% and that of CCD was 60%. Conclusion: Add conclussion. The above statement is results.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KHANI, MARYAM, DABBAGHI, ARASH, & Shams, Nasrin. (2021). In vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Periapical Direct Digital Radiography in. JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL, 20(1 ), 45-51. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/954053/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KHANI MARYAM, DABBAGHI ARASH, Shams Nasrin. In vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Periapical Direct Digital Radiography in. JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2021;20(1 ):45-51. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/954053/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MARYAM KHANI, ARASH DABBAGHI, and Nasrin Shams, “In vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography with Periapical Direct Digital Radiography in,” JUNDISHAPUR SCIENTIFIC MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 20, no. 1 , pp. 45–51, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/954053/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button