A SURVEY OF RATIONAL ARGUMENTS FOR IMAM'S INFALLIBILITY FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF SAYYED MURTAZA AND QAZI ' ABDULJABBAR

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HADIDI ALIASGHAR; EMAMINIYA MOHAMMADREZA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH Year:2017 | Volume:19 | Issue:2 (72) Page(s): 165-188

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,672

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A SURVEY OF RATIONAL ARGUMENTS FOR IMAM'S INFALLIBILITY FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF SAYYED MURTAZA AND QAZI ' ABDULJABBAR

Author(s)

HADIDI ALIASGHAR | EMAMINIYA MOHAMMADREZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IMAM'S INFALLIBILITYQ1

SAYYED MURTAZAQ1

QAZI 'ABDULJABBARQ2

IMPOSSIBILITY OF PROGRESSIONQ1

INCUMBENCY OF CONFORMITYQ1

PRESERVATION OF SHARI'AQ1

Abstract

Among lots of rational arguments for IMAM'S INFALLIBILITY one can pick up IMPOSSIBILITY OF PROGRESSION of Imams; incumbency of preservation of Sharī' a; and INCUMBENCY OF CONFORMITY with Imam –for which Imami scholars have always argued enthusiastically. On the other hand, other Islamic denominations including Mu' tazila do appropriately not valorize the infallibility, and have strived to object to the arguments for IMAM'S INFALLIBILITY such as the abovementioned ones. Having put forward a sketch of and an introduction to the two books, namely al-Mughnī and al-Shāfī, along with a definition of infallibility, this article will explain and illustrate the aforementioned rational arguments from the viewpoints of the two scholars. Alongside this argumentative route, it will be clarified that Qāzī's objections cannot undermine the arguments because, while dealing with the argument for IMPOSSIBILITY OF PROGRESSION, the main emphasis of Imami scholars has been placed upon people's fallibility not upon the problem of punishments accomplishment (Iqāmat al-hudūd). Furthermore, in the argument for preservation of Sharī'a, Qāzī's proposed alternatives cannot be sufficient in order to preserve Sharī' a, and in the argument for incumbency of Imam's conformity, one's failure to follow Imam can be justifiably interpreted as undervaluing Imamate. Nonetheless, some of Sayyed Murtazā's responses stay in need of further illustrations.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HADIDI, ALIASGHAR, & EMAMINIYA, MOHAMMADREZA. (2017). A SURVEY OF RATIONAL ARGUMENTS FOR IMAM'S INFALLIBILITY FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF SAYYED MURTAZA AND QAZI ' ABDULJABBAR. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 19(2 (72)), 165-188. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/98141/en

Vancouver: Copy

HADIDI ALIASGHAR, EMAMINIYA MOHAMMADREZA. A SURVEY OF RATIONAL ARGUMENTS FOR IMAM'S INFALLIBILITY FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF SAYYED MURTAZA AND QAZI ' ABDULJABBAR. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH[Internet]. 2017;19(2 (72)):165-188. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/98141/en

IEEE: Copy

ALIASGHAR HADIDI, and MOHAMMADREZA EMAMINIYA, “A SURVEY OF RATIONAL ARGUMENTS FOR IMAM'S INFALLIBILITY FROM THE VIEWPOINTS OF SAYYED MURTAZA AND QAZI ' ABDULJABBAR,” JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, vol. 19, no. 2 (72), pp. 165–188, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/98141/en

Related Journal Papers