THE ATTITUDE OF UNIVERSITIES' CHANCELLORS TO COLLEGIAL PLANNING IN IRAN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAZRAFSHAN MOGHADAM M.; NOUR SHAHI N.; POURSHAFEE H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: STUDIES IN EDUCATION & PSYCHOLOGY Year:2005 | Volume:6 | Issue:2 Page(s): 93-124

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,019

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE ATTITUDE OF UNIVERSITIES' CHANCELLORS TO COLLEGIAL PLANNING IN IRAN

Author(s)

BAZRAFSHAN MOGHADAM M. | NOUR SHAHI N. | POURSHAFEE H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ATTITUDEQ4

UNIVERSITIES CHANCELLORSQ4

LINEAR-ANALYTIC AND SYSTEMIC PARADIGMSQ4

Abstract

Investigating the ATTITUDE of Iranian UNIVERSITIES CHANCELLORS to collegial planning based on systemic and linear - analytic paradigm is the main purpose of this study. All of the UNIVERSITIES CHANCELLORS had been considered as subjects of this research. Although, referring to ability of forecasting, the findings showed that the UNIVERSITIES CHANCELLORS took a point of view toward systematic paradigm, but there were many evidences that support us to making this result that most of the participants took an approaches to linear-analytic paradigm in regard of the three main concepts including time, evaluation and goal back to the higher education in Iran. It means that, the time is returnable, previous events could be reproducible in the future, evaluation use just for controlling and reporting to superiors and the goals could be considered unchangeable. Finally, it seems that the dominant viewpoint in the universities is linear-analytic.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

BAZRAFSHAN MOGHADAM, M., NOUR SHAHI, N., & POURSHAFEE, H.. (2005). THE ATTITUDE OF UNIVERSITIES' CHANCELLORS TO COLLEGIAL PLANNING IN IRAN. STUDIES IN EDUCATION & PSYCHOLOGY, 6(2), 93-124. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/99248/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAZRAFSHAN MOGHADAM M., NOUR SHAHI N., POURSHAFEE H.. THE ATTITUDE OF UNIVERSITIES' CHANCELLORS TO COLLEGIAL PLANNING IN IRAN. STUDIES IN EDUCATION & PSYCHOLOGY[Internet]. 2005;6(2):93-124. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/99248/en

IEEE: Copy

M. BAZRAFSHAN MOGHADAM, N. NOUR SHAHI, and H. POURSHAFEE, “THE ATTITUDE OF UNIVERSITIES' CHANCELLORS TO COLLEGIAL PLANNING IN IRAN,” STUDIES IN EDUCATION & PSYCHOLOGY, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 93–124, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/99248/en

Related Journal Papers