Aim: Recurrent upthous stomatitis is a lesion with high prevalence and inspite of numerou studies, there are
little knowledge about its different aspects. Success in RAS treatment depends on correct diagnosis, and control
of etiologicand systemic factors contributing to its development."Adcortyle" is a chemical drug widely used for
symptomatic relief of RAS lesions but it has some disadvantages such as undesirable side effects and high price.
"Myrtle" is a herbal drug, that has been used for RAS treatment since a few years ago. This study carried out to
compare the effects of these two drugs on RAS leasion.
Material and Methods: The study was a clinical trial with sequential sampling. Samples were divided into 3
group (A,B,C) taking "Myrtle", "Adcortyle" and placebo respectively.Three groups were matched according to
education, history of trauma at the site ofIesions, location and number ofIesions, the use of antibiotics during 2
days ago, history of burning sensation and history of systemic diseases contributing to the development of
lesions. The results were analysed using t-test and chi-square.
Results: The tome of burning sensation relie of were 2.71±0.95 (A), 2.64±0.76 (B) and 6.8±1.23 (C) days.According to T-Test, there was significant difference between Band C and also A and C (P<0.01),but there was
no significant difference between A and B drug. A and B reduced the time of objective improvement
significantly compared to C group (P<0.01),but there was no significantdifference between A and B (P<0.001).
The numberof cases treated with Adcortyle were less than that of treated with Myrtle (P<0.001).
Conclusion: With regard to the above results "Myrtle" can be used as a substitute for "Adcortyle" in our country because of its less side effects and better availability.