مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,453
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE CLASSICAL AND MODERN THEORIES OF MEASUREMENT IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE AND MEDICINE: A REVIEW ON THE METHODOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS

Pages

  302-315

Abstract

 The CLASSICAL TEST THEORY (CTT) and ITEM RESPONSE THEORY (IRT) are widely used in construction and analysis of exams and questionnaires. Because of the various shortcomings of CTT, IRT has been designed. Even though IRT has overcome most of the limitations of CTT and has made computer adaptive testing possible, it is still important to point out that not enough reasons exist to totally discard CTT. This theory is still in use in different scientific fields. Previous studies have showed that IRT is complementary to CTT, and is not a competitive model. The main difference between these two theories is that CTT is test-based, but IRT is item-based, for example, measurement error modeling in CTT and IRT were done in the test and item level, respectively. In practice, the IRT is shown to have very good performance in dealing with the problems presented in the CTT model, such as conditional standard errors, developing parallel tests, equating, and item bias and adaptive testing. In this study IRT and CTT are explored and the weaknesses and advantages of both theories have been discussed.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    HABIBI, MOJTABA, KHODAEI, EBRAHIM, & IZANLOO, BALAL. (2012). THE CLASSICAL AND MODERN THEORIES OF MEASUREMENT IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE AND MEDICINE: A REVIEW ON THE METHODOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES, 10(4 (25)), 302-315. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/106469/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HABIBI MOJTABA, KHODAEI EBRAHIM, IZANLOO BALAL. THE CLASSICAL AND MODERN THEORIES OF MEASUREMENT IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE AND MEDICINE: A REVIEW ON THE METHODOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2012;10(4 (25)):302-315. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/106469/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOJTABA HABIBI, EBRAHIM KHODAEI, and BALAL IZANLOO, “THE CLASSICAL AND MODERN THEORIES OF MEASUREMENT IN BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE AND MEDICINE: A REVIEW ON THE METHODOLOGICAL PROPERTIES, BENEFITS AND LIMITATIONS,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN BEHAVIOURAL SCIENCES, vol. 10, no. 4 (25), pp. 302–315, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/106469/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button