مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

849
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Youg and Bergess classification for fractures of the pelvic ring

Pages

  22-29

Abstract

 Background: Determination of interobserver and intraobserver Reliability are one of the most important issue in educations with are necessary for validation of Classifications. Methods: Radiographies and CT scans of 160 patients were assessed by three orthopedics to determination of the anatomic location of Fractures and to determine Classification of Fractures according to Young and Burgess Classification and then the agreement between observers and among each observer was assessed. Results: Pubic rami were the most common anatomic Fractures and LC I was the most common Fracture type. CT scan was increased significantly the accuracy of diagnosis of Fractures of the sacrum and ilium. Interobserver Reliability to determination of the Fracture type was 0. 35 (0. 28– 0. 52) using radiography alone, and was 0. 49 (0. 44– 0. 76) using both radiographies and CT scan. The least agreement was observed in types LC II and APC II. Intraobserver Reliability in this field were 0. 40 (0. 31– 0. 58), 0. 41 (0. 32– 0. 51) and 0. 44 (0. 36– 0. 55) for three observers using radiographies alone and 0. 54 (0. 39– 0. 77), 0. 53 (0. 42-0. 72) and 0. 55 (0. 46– 0. 73) respectively using radiographies and CT scans. Conclusion: there were acceptable interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities in Young and Burgess Classification and our results approximately were the same as other studies.

Multimedia

  • No record.
  • Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AHMADZADEH HESHMATI, AFSHIN, KARIMI MOBARAKEH, MAHMOOD, & SAIED, ALIREZA. (2018). Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Youg and Bergess classification for fractures of the pelvic ring. RAZI JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JOURNAL OF IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), 24(165 ), 22-29. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/11055/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AHMADZADEH HESHMATI AFSHIN, KARIMI MOBARAKEH MAHMOOD, SAIED ALIREZA. Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Youg and Bergess classification for fractures of the pelvic ring. RAZI JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JOURNAL OF IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES)[Internet]. 2018;24(165 ):22-29. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/11055/en

    IEEE: Copy

    AFSHIN AHMADZADEH HESHMATI, MAHMOOD KARIMI MOBARAKEH, and ALIREZA SAIED, “Assessment of interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Youg and Bergess classification for fractures of the pelvic ring,” RAZI JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES (JOURNAL OF IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES), vol. 24, no. 165 , pp. 22–29, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/11055/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button