COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS FOR ACADEMIC MEMBERS’ PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS IN THE VARIOUS UNIVERSITIES IN AROUND THE WORLD ACCORDING TO THE DIAGNOSTIC MODEL: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KHATIBAN MAHNAZ; PAZARGADI MEHRNOOSH; ASHKTORAB TAHEREH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Strides in Development of Medical Education Journal Year:2014 | Volume:11 | Issue:1 Page(s): 23-34

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,226

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS FOR ACADEMIC MEMBERS’ PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS IN THE VARIOUS UNIVERSITIES IN AROUND THE WORLD ACCORDING TO THE DIAGNOSTIC MODEL: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

Author(s)

KHATIBAN MAHNAZ | PAZARGADI MEHRNOOSH | ASHKTORAB TAHEREH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PERFORMANCE APPRAISALQ2

FACULTY MEMBERQ2

QUALITATIVE STUDYQ2

Abstract

Background & Objective: Reviewing the kinds of performance evaluation systems for academic members applying by different universities is one of the most important approaches to develop one. Therefore, as part of a broader research aimed to provide a performance evaluation model, we attempted to compare the performance evaluation systems of some universities around the world.Methods: This study was performed through a qualitative content analysis method with the theoretical approach based on the PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL Diagnostic Model (Wolf, 2003). The study population included all universities of the five continents. The universities that had their performance evaluation systems in English in their websites were chosen as sample group. A search was also conducted with the determined keywords through the search engines. The faculty performance evaluation systems of 19 universities were chosen from the continents: America (10), Europe (3), Oceania (2), Africa (3) and Asia (one in Turkey).Results: The philosophies of all the reviewed performance evaluation systems were performance recognition, continuous development, identifying performance barriers and individual development needs. These systems were related to the systems of payment, compensation, recruiting, and performance development. The effectiveness of a FACULTY MEMBER was characterized by his/her performance indicators in line with the mission of organization in education, scholarship, and clerical area. There was a combination of the trait-, behavior- and result-based systems with different weights according to organizational and professional positions. The quantitative and qualitative data were gathered by different measures from multiple sources.Conclusion: Considering the findings, the reviewed performance evaluation systems for academic members have important issues according to the Wolf’s diagnostic model.

Cites

THE ROLE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENT IN EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT AND INTERDUCING ITS MEASUREMENT TOOLS

References

Cite

APA: Copy

KHATIBAN, MAHNAZ, PAZARGADI, MEHRNOOSH, & ASHKTORAB, TAHEREH. (2014). COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS FOR ACADEMIC MEMBERS’ PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS IN THE VARIOUS UNIVERSITIES IN AROUND THE WORLD ACCORDING TO THE DIAGNOSTIC MODEL: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 11(1), 23-34. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/116762/en

Vancouver: Copy

KHATIBAN MAHNAZ, PAZARGADI MEHRNOOSH, ASHKTORAB TAHEREH. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS FOR ACADEMIC MEMBERS’ PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS IN THE VARIOUS UNIVERSITIES IN AROUND THE WORLD ACCORDING TO THE DIAGNOSTIC MODEL: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION[Internet]. 2014;11(1):23-34. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/116762/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHNAZ KHATIBAN, MEHRNOOSH PAZARGADI, and TAHEREH ASHKTORAB, “COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS FOR ACADEMIC MEMBERS’ PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEMS IN THE VARIOUS UNIVERSITIES IN AROUND THE WORLD ACCORDING TO THE DIAGNOSTIC MODEL: A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH,” STRIDES IN DEVELOPMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23–34, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/116762/en

Related Journal Papers