TEHRAN'S HOSPITALS EVALUATION METHODS FROM CHIEF EXECUTIVES (C.E.O) POINTS OF VIEWS AND HEADQUARTER

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AMERIOUN A.; KHALESI N.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATION Year:2007 | Volume:9 | Issue:26 Page(s): 39-44

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,052

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TEHRAN'S HOSPITALS EVALUATION METHODS FROM CHIEF EXECUTIVES (C.E.O) POINTS OF VIEWS AND HEADQUARTER

Author(s)

AMERIOUN A. | KHALESI N. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EVALUATIONSQ3

HOSPITALQ3

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERQ4

Abstract

Introductions: Evaluation is considered as an integrated and administrative activity, because using measurable information is followed by improvement in administrative activities. Given the importance of HOSPITALs EVALUATIONS this research is aimed and carried out to determining current methods for public and private Tehran's HOSPITALs evaluation methods from chief executives points of views and headquarter.Methods: This is a descriptive cross sectional study; by research community including 70 persons; 35 HOSPITALs' chief executives including heads, managers, matrons of HOSPITALs; and 35 ministry of Health authorities and headquarters' experts; and Tehran county located universities health chancellors working on HOSPITALs EVALUATIONS. The mean collecting information tools were a valid and reliable questionnaire and interviews and documented reviews. The collected data using EPI INFO and SPSS software processed and by t-test and X² tests analyzed; and presented by descriptive and analytic statistics.Results: Ten percent (7 persons) were agreed with composition, timing, and scoring methods for current EVALUATIONS. Twenty percent (14 persons) believed that current EVALUATIONS would result improvement in efficiency and effectiveness of HOSPITALs performances; and 22.9% (16 persons) believed that current EVALUATIONS would achieved Ministry of Health targets. Twenty percent (14 persons) agreed to joining public and private HOSPITAL evaluation forms; and 18.6% believed that evaluation methods would be effective for establish medical tariffs. Conclusion: Generally public HOSPITALs and authorizes, headquarters experts of Ministry of Health and health chancellors of Tehran's medical sciences universities did not agree with current HOSPITAL EVALUATIONS method, and willing to change EVALUATIONS methods and presenting a proper paradigm.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AMERIOUN, A., & KHALESI, N.. (2007). TEHRAN'S HOSPITALS EVALUATION METHODS FROM CHIEF EXECUTIVES (C.E.O) POINTS OF VIEWS AND HEADQUARTER. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, 9(26), 39-44. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/130127/en

Vancouver: Copy

AMERIOUN A., KHALESI N.. TEHRAN'S HOSPITALS EVALUATION METHODS FROM CHIEF EXECUTIVES (C.E.O) POINTS OF VIEWS AND HEADQUARTER. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATION[Internet]. 2007;9(26):39-44. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/130127/en

IEEE: Copy

A. AMERIOUN, and N. KHALESI, “TEHRAN'S HOSPITALS EVALUATION METHODS FROM CHIEF EXECUTIVES (C.E.O) POINTS OF VIEWS AND HEADQUARTER,” JOURNAL OF HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, vol. 9, no. 26, pp. 39–44, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/130127/en

Related Journal Papers