COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF CLINICAL EVALUATION BY TWO METHODS: PORTFOLIO AND POPULAR, ON SATISFACTION OF NURSE STUDENTS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

LATIFI M.; SHABAN M.; NIKBAKHT NASRABADI A.; MEHRAN A.; PARSA YEKTA Z.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Nursing Research Year:2011 | Volume:6 | Issue:21 Page(s): 15-28

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

857

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF CLINICAL EVALUATION BY TWO METHODS: PORTFOLIO AND POPULAR, ON SATISFACTION OF NURSE STUDENTS

Author(s)

Keywords

CLINICAL EVALUATIONQ3

PORTFOLIOQ3

SATISFACTIONQ2

NURSE STUDENTQ2

Abstract

Introduction: CLINICAL EVALUATION is one of the important factors in nursing education, and there are some difficulties in evaluation of clinical skills, representing more practical and effective ways in this field is the topic of many researches. So, in this research we designed a lesson plan based on PORTFOLIO evaluation method and used it in NURSE STUDENT's clinical courses. Then we compared their SATISFACTION from CLINICAL EVALUATION with popular method.Methods: In this experimental research, students in fifth semester of nursing at Tehran University of Nursing and Midwifery are participated. These students were divided into subgroups of 7 and 8. Each of these subgroups passed the clinical probationary in cardiac unit. After explaining the research goals, these subgroups were put in two research groups randomly. In PORTFOLIO group (n=21) students evaluated by using PORTFOLIO method and PORTFOLIO evaluation tool. And in other group (n=20), popular form of CLINICAL EVALUATION in university was used. Both groups answered the SATISFACTION questionnaire in last day. Content validity and reliability of questionnair was tested. Data analyzed by SPSS software and with Chi square, Fisher Exact, Mann Whitney, Wilcoxon and spearman's rho tests.Results: Findings showed that students had 21.5±1.36 years of old and most of them was female and married. SATISFACTION in PORTFOLIO group was meaningfully greater than popular group in three aspects: alignment of subjects in evaluation method and form with clinical course objects (P=0.04), creating interest and motivation for participation of students in learning (P=0.005), motivating students to use books and other scientific references (P=0.01). SATISFACTION of popular group from fairness of evaluation method was greater than PORTFOLIO group (P=0.017). There was no meaningful results in other aspects.Conclusion: More SATISFACTION in some aspects from PORTFOLIO method represents acceptance of new active methods of learning and evaluation by students. so, using PORTFOLIO as one of the best method of CLINICAL EVALUATION in nursing and doing more researches advised.

Cites

EFFECT OF PORTFOLIO APPLICATION ON SATISFACTION AND EDUCATIONAL ACHIEVEMENT OF NURSING STUDENTS IN PSYCHIATRY CLERKSHIP

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

LATIFI, M., SHABAN, M., NIKBAKHT NASRABADI, A., MEHRAN, A., & PARSA YEKTA, Z.. (2011). COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF CLINICAL EVALUATION BY TWO METHODS: PORTFOLIO AND POPULAR, ON SATISFACTION OF NURSE STUDENTS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 6(21), 15-28. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/138081/en

Vancouver: Copy

LATIFI M., SHABAN M., NIKBAKHT NASRABADI A., MEHRAN A., PARSA YEKTA Z.. COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF CLINICAL EVALUATION BY TWO METHODS: PORTFOLIO AND POPULAR, ON SATISFACTION OF NURSE STUDENTS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH[Internet]. 2011;6(21):15-28. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/138081/en

IEEE: Copy

M. LATIFI, M. SHABAN, A. NIKBAKHT NASRABADI, A. MEHRAN, and Z. PARSA YEKTA, “COMPARISON OF THE EFFECT OF CLINICAL EVALUATION BY TWO METHODS: PORTFOLIO AND POPULAR, ON SATISFACTION OF NURSE STUDENTS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, vol. 6, no. 21, pp. 15–28, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/138081/en

Related Journal Papers