The efficacy of Massive Transfusion Protocol / whole blood transfusion: An umbrella review

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Sahrai Hadi; Arefdehgani Kosar; Hajipoor Kashgsaray Nasim; Balafar Moloud; Hamzehzadeh Sina; Shahsavarinia Kavous; Salehi Pourmehr Hanieh

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: TRAUMA MONTHLY Year:2024 | Volume:29 | Issue:6 Page(s): 1262-1281

Download Full-Text

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The efficacy of Massive Transfusion Protocol / whole blood transfusion: An umbrella review

Author(s)

Keywords

Massive blood transfusion

Trauma

Systematic review

Abstract

Introduction: Although massive transfusion protocol (MTP) has been used extensively in the treatment of patients with bleeding trauma, its actual efficacy remains unknown. This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses aims to update the evidence and assess the impact of implementing MTP/ whole blood transfusion on the mortality of trauma patients.Methods: Data sources: This umbrella review searched Medline (via Ovid), Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL databases, JBISRIR, Epistemonikos, EPPI-Centre, CRD, and PROSPERO for possible systematic reviews from inception until October 2023. Study eligibility criteria, participants, and interventions: Reviews that reported data comparing different types of massive blood perfusion were included. The quality of studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool. Our study outcomes, 30-day mortality, and 24-hour mortality, were re-analyzed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (CMA 3.0).Results: Thirty studies met the eligibility criteria. Eventually, we included eight studies in the current meta-analysis. The calculated odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 30-day mortality in MTP and non-MTP comparison was OR = 0.654, 95% CI: 0.576, 0.741, P-value <0.001, and similarly, when comparing the whole blood group and blood component group, significant differences were found between the groups in terms of 24h-mortality 0.763, (95% CI: 0.608, 0.957), and P-value = 0.020. The results showed low heterogeneity among the studies.Conclusion: Our results support that MTP decreases 30-day mortality compared to non-MTP. Furthermore, our analysis showed that whole blood transfusion decreases the odds of 24-hour mortality compared to blood components.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans