Comparative Study of Technology-based Proficiency Tests and Paper-based Tests (Case Study: The Department of Vocational and Technical Education of Alborz)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BAGHERPOUR HOSSEIN; mahmoudi sefid kouhi hosein

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Educational Sciences Year:2018 | Volume:6 (25) | Issue:1 Page(s): 165-184

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

436

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparative Study of Technology-based Proficiency Tests and Paper-based Tests (Case Study: The Department of Vocational and Technical Education of Alborz)

Author(s)

BAGHERPOUR HOSSEIN | mahmoudi sefid kouhi hosein | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

AssessmentQ2

Technology-based testQ1

test paperQ1

Technical and Vocational Training OrganizationQ1

Abstract

Introduction The rapid development of information and communication technology in teaching and learning has changed the main approach of pen and paper-based test system to a Technology-based test. Computers and related technologies provide powerful tools for solving evaluation challenges and facilitate the recording of a wider set of cognitive skills. The study aims to Compare the technology-based proficiency tests and paper-based tests from the perspective of General Department of Vocational and Technical Education of Alborz test applicants has been conducted. Method The research method is a descriptive method. The population of this study were 420 examinees from Alborz Vocational and Technical Educational Department which 201 subjects were selected as cluster sampling using Cochran formula as sample size. This study in a pilot study terms of functional and data collection method. Data collection consisted of researcher-made questionnaire with 5-point scale Likert with reliability of 0. 89. The questionnaire was prepared in three dimensions: Technical, environmental and managerial factors. The reliability of the questionnaire has been satisfied by AMOS software, factor analysis based on structural equations. The significance of factor loadings indicated the significance of all factor loads at the level of 0. 001. The fittest indices indicated that the model has a relatively good fit. Questionnaire administered in two independent subject groups including computer-based and paper-based subject groups. Data analysis was conducted based on two levels of descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS software, and analyzing the results was performed by the analysis of variance and t independent samples. Results The research results indicates the higher average level of electronic examinees' comments and meaningful difference between the average valuations via Technology-based tests compared with traditional or paper-based tests. Discussion Also, the results of the research indicate that the average level of e-readership is higher and the mean value of the evaluation is significantly different from the traditional tests or paper tests. Regarding the results of the research, it seems that planning for implementation of new models of evaluation and the implementation of a variety of Technology-based tests for the types of tests should take place.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BAGHERPOUR, HOSSEIN, & mahmoudi sefid kouhi, hosein. (2018). Comparative Study of Technology-based Proficiency Tests and Paper-based Tests (Case Study: The Department of Vocational and Technical Education of Alborz). JOURNAL OF EDUCATION (JOURNAL OF EDUCATION & PSYCHOLOGY), 6 (25)(1 ), 165-184. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/186657/en

Vancouver: Copy

BAGHERPOUR HOSSEIN, mahmoudi sefid kouhi hosein. Comparative Study of Technology-based Proficiency Tests and Paper-based Tests (Case Study: The Department of Vocational and Technical Education of Alborz). JOURNAL OF EDUCATION (JOURNAL OF EDUCATION & PSYCHOLOGY)[Internet]. 2018;6 (25)(1 ):165-184. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/186657/en

IEEE: Copy

HOSSEIN BAGHERPOUR, and hosein mahmoudi sefid kouhi, “Comparative Study of Technology-based Proficiency Tests and Paper-based Tests (Case Study: The Department of Vocational and Technical Education of Alborz),” JOURNAL OF EDUCATION (JOURNAL OF EDUCATION & PSYCHOLOGY), vol. 6 (25), no. 1 , pp. 165–184, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/186657/en

Related Journal Papers